Marcas de Sustentabilidade: Tensões Discursivas na Indústria de Cosméticos da América Latina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.45(2024).5364Palavras-chave:
comunicação sobre sustentabilidade, tensões discursivas, indústria de cosméticos, responsabilidade social, marcas sustentáveisResumo
Na tentativa de compreender como as principais marcas de cosméticos da América Latina comunicam as suas iniciativas de sustentabilidade e responsabilidade social empresarial, levantamos as seguintes questões: (a) como é que os utilizadores das redes sociais interagem com o conteúdo de sustentabilidade divulgado pelas principais marcas de cosméticos da América Latina?, (b) que discursos utilizam essas marcas para evidenciar o seu compromisso com a sustentabilidade?, e (c) quais são as tensões e contradições implícitas nos discursos de sustentabilidade e responsabilidade social empresarial dessas marcas? Para responder a estas questões, analisamos quatro marcas bem estabelecidas na indústria de cosméticos latino-americana: Avon, Natura, O Boticário e Yanbal. Através de análises qualitativas e quantitativas, os resultados obtidos permitem-nos identificar as tensões decorrentes da tentativa das empresas de cosméticos em conciliar a procura do lucro com a promoção do desenvolvimento sustentável. Mais concretamente, argumentamos que o discurso sobre a sustentabilidade das principais marcas de cosméticos na América Latina é particularmente apelativo para o público quando destaca preocupações ambientais e menos quando se refere à sustentabilidade social. Além disso, demonstramos uma interação complexa de tensões que incluem a justaposição de três relações dialéticas neste discurso de sustentabilidade: a tensão entre sustentabilidade e capitalismo, entre o impacto empresarial e a agência do consumidor, e entre empoderamento e papéis de género.
Downloads
Referências
Álvarez-Nobell, A., Arzuaga-Williams, M., Guillén, G., Pagani, G., & Vásquez Donoso, C. (2022). Escuchando lo silenciado: Explorar y aprender con las poblaciones, organizaciones y problemáticas invisibilizadas. Memorias del tercer encuentro de la Red Latinoamericana de Investigación en Comunicación Organizacional (RedLAco). Red Latinoamericana de Investigación en Comunicación Organizacional; Universidad Católica del Uruguay.
Angel, A. (2022). The struggles for organizational discursive hegemony on the sustainability of fracking in Colombia. Southern Communication Journal, 87(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2021.1989628
Angel, A. (2023). Comunicación de la sostenibilidad: Análisis de las empresas colombianas incluidas en el índice de sostenibilidad de 2020. In C. Alvarado (Ed.), Comunicación y organizaciones en Colombia (pp. 37–66). Universidad de Manizales.
Atkinson, P., Delamont, S., & Housley, W. (2008). Contours of culture: Complex ethnography and the ethnography of complexity. Rowman Altamira.
Avon. (n.d.). Sustainability. Retrieved July 27, 2023, from https://www.avon.co/avon-co/Sustentabilidad-Social/Sostenibilidad-Social.html
Avon Colombia. (2019, September 29). ¿Te gustaría tener independencia económica? [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5byKdY6HW8
Barroso, M. B. (2015). Comunicación en valores y educación ambiental. Pangea, 6(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.52203/pangea.v6i1.113
Barroso, M. B. (2021). Relaciones públicas en organizaciones sostenibles: El caso de las empresas de triple impacto [Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Málaga]. RiUMA. https://hdl.handle.net/10630/22469
Baxter, L. A., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2008). Relational dialectics theory. In L. A. Baxter & D. O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329529
Benyus, J. M. (2012). Biomímesis (A. García Leal, Trans.). Tusquets. (Original work published 1997)
o Boticário. (2019, November 13). Boticário apresenta: Boti Recicla, o maior programa de reciclagem do Brasil em pontos de coleta [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7CqWeHXVaY
o Boticário. (2022, August 29). Novo Arbo Forest [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14oVdGG0aDo
Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. University of California Press.
Capriotti, P. (2009). Branding corporativo: Fundamentos para la gestión estratégica de la identidad corporativa. Instituto de Investigación en Relaciones Públicas.
Capriotti, P., Zeler, I., & Oliveira, A. (2019). Comunicación dialógica 2.0 en Facebook. Análisis de la interacción en las organizaciones de América Latina. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (74), 1094–1113. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2019-1373
Chang, C. (2011). Feeling ambivalent about going green. Journal of Advertising, 40(4), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367400402
Chaves, N. (2005). La imagen corporativa: Teoría y práctica de la identificación institucional. Gustavo Gili.
Chen, A., & Eriksson, G. (2022). Connoting a neoliberal and entrepreneurial discourse of science through infographics and integrated design: The case of ‘functional’ healthy drinks. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(3), 290–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.1874450
The Core Writing Team, Lee, H., & Romero, J. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_LongerReport.pdf
Coupland, J. (2009). Time, the body and the reversibility of ageing: Commodifying the decade. Ageing & Society, 29(6), 953–976. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X09008794
Dalmarco, D. De A. S., Hamza, K. M., & Aoqui, C. (2015). The implementation of product development strategies focused on sustainability: From Brazil — The case of Natura Sou Cosmetics brand. Environmental Quality Management, 24(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21394
Deetz, S. (2003). Disciplinary power, conflict suppression and human resources management. In S. Deetz (Ed.), Studying management critically (pp. 23–45). SAGE.
Elkington, J. (2019). Green swans: The coming boom in regenerative capitalism. Fast Company Press.
Ferns, G., & Amaeshi, K. (2019). Struggles at the summits: Discourse coalitions, field boundaries, and the shifting role of business in sustainable development. Business & Society, 58(8), 1533–1571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317701884
Hartono, D. A., Prima, S. A. B., & Dewobroto, W. S. (2022). A multimodal critical discourse analysis of Garnier green beauty advertisement. International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijeal.v2i2.1654
Honeyman, R., & Jana, T. (2019). The B Corp handbook: How you can use business as a force for good. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Kenalemang-Palm, L. M., & Eriksson, G. (2021). The scientifization of “green” anti-ageing cosmetics in online marketing: A multimodal critical discourse analysis. Social Semiotics, 33(5), 1026–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.1981128
Krohling-Kunsch, M. (2015). La comunicación en la gestión de la sostenibilidad en las organizaciones. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 6(2), 9–62. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2015.6.2.02
Krohling-Kunsch. M., & Oliveira, I. de L. (Eds.). (2009). A comunicação na gestão da sustentabilidade das organizações. Difusão Editora.
Leonidou, L. C., Leonidou, C. N., Palihawadana, D., & Hultman, M. (2011). Evaluating the green advertising practices of international firms: A trend analysis. International Marketing Review, 28(1), 6–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331111107080
Livesey, S. M. (2002). The discourse of the middle ground: Citizen Shell commits to sustainable development. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(3),313–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318902153001
Manuti, A. (2005). The rhetoric of work flexibility: A diatextual frame of Italian political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(3), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.3.03man
Markkula, A., & Moisander, J. (2012). Discursive confusion over sustainable consumption: A discursive perspective on the perplexity of marketplace knowledge. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35, 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-011-9184-3
Martins, A. M., & Marto, J. M. (2023). A sustainable life cycle for cosmetics: From design and development to post-use phase. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 35, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2023.101178
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1822-0
Merrigan, G., Huston, C. L., & Johnston, R. (2009). Communication research methods. Oxford University Press.
Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? The International Journal of Business in Society, 1(2), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005486
Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
Mumby, D. K. (2001). Power and politics. In F. Jablin & L. Putnam (Eds), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp.585–623). SAGE.
Mumby, D. K. (2016). Organizing beyond organization: Branding, discourse, and communicative capitalism. Organization, 23(6), 884–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508416631164
Natura. (2022a, February 15). El 2022 nos propone un nuevo comienzo. Y este nuevo comienzo incluye especialmente a la educación. El colegio es mucho [Status update]. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/506627449430313/posts/4860384057387942
Natura. (2022b, May 22). En este día de la biodiversidad, más es más. Más especies, más vida, más árboles de pie. Celebremos el compromiso [Video]. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/natura.colombia/videos/755129175499419/
Natura Colombia. (2021a, February 10). Más belleza, menos residuos [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjEgyiN1ja0
Natura Colombia. (2021b, May 31). Biobelleza [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2M06TjXkqo
Natura Colombia. (2022a, April 22). Con Natura mantienes la selva en pie | Natura [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXJ2dSH5MqA
oBoticário. (n.d.). Sustainability. Retrieved July 27, 2023, from https://www.oboticario.com.co/pages/sostenibilidad
Oe, H., & Yamaoka, Y. (2022). The impact of communicating sustainability and ethical behaviour of the cosmetic producers: Evidence from Thailand. Sustainability, 14(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020882
Otálora, M. I. C., Gómez, L. E. N., Díaz, R. G., Martínez-Iglesias, J. M. Á., Saorín, J. M., & Gómez, A. B. (2022). Comportamiento proambiental: Análisis bibliométrico: 2000-2021 y caracterización de perspectivas. OIDLES. Desarrollo Local y Economía Social, 16(32), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.51896/OIDLES/ARQV9018
Ourahmoune, N., Binninger, A. S., & Robert, I. (2014). Brand narratives, sustainability, and gender: A socio-semiotic approach. Journal of Macromarketing, 34(3), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146714528335
Pelenc, J., Bazile, D., & Ceruti, C. (2015). Collective capability and collective agency for sustainability: A case study. Ecological Economics, 118, 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.001
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. SAGE.
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421
Royston, J. P. (1982). An extension of Shapiro and Wilk’s W test for normality to large samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 31(2), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.2307/2347973
Sabeti, H. (2011). The for-benefit enterprise. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2011/11/the-for-benefit-enterprise
Seo, M., Putnam, L. L., & Bartunek, J. M. (2004). Dualities and tensions of planned organizational change. In M. S. Poole & A. H. Van den Ven (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation (pp. 73–107). Oxford University Press.
Signitzer, B., & Prexl, A. (2007). Corporate sustainability communications: Aspects of theory and professionalization. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260701726996
Suárez Monsalve, A. M., & Álvarez-Nobell, A. (2022). Entre la ética y los resultados: nuevos desafíos para profesionales de la comunicación en América Latina. Mediaciones, 18(28), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.26620/uniminuto.mediaciones.18.28.2022.119-129
Tracy, S. J., & Geist-Martin, P. (2014). Organizing ethnography and qualitative approaches. In L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 245–269). SAGE.
Verk, N., Golob, U., & Podnar, K. (2021). A dynamic review of the emergence of corporate social responsibility communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04232-6
Wackerly, D., Mendenhall, W., & Scheaffer, R. L. (2014). Mathematical statistics with applications. Cengage Learning.
Yanbal. (n.d.). Sustainability. Retrieved July 27, 2023, from https://www.yanbal.com/co/corporate/sostenibilidad
Yanbal. (2019, December 4). Janine Belmont presidente ejecutivo - CADE ejecutivos 2018 [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQNKszB-5_k
Yanbal. (2021, July 6). Conoce nuestra nueva iniciativa: Mujer es poder [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPwjU0iyOOI
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2024 Adriana Angel, Alejandro Álvarez-Nobell
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
Os autores são titulares dos direitos de autor, concedendo à revista o direito de primeira publicação. O trabalho é licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
