Digital Citizenship, Territorial Inequality and Protest Visibility: Tamil Nadu’s Kudankulam and Thoothukudi Struggles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.49(2026).6781Keywords:
digital communication, citizenship, territorial branding, environmental justice, Tamil NaduAbstract
A digital presence is crucial for civic recognition since globalisation and digitalisation have altered how regions are portrayed. This article examines two environmental justice movements in the same state in Tamil Nadu, India: the Kudankulam anti-nuclear resistance movement and the Thoothukudi anti-Sterlite resistance movement. The study employs a mixed-methods design, including a quantitative analysis of 400 social media posts (200 from each protest) and qualitative audience interviews. The analysis reveals disparate levels of engagement on digital platforms. The Thoothukudi protest had broad attention through arresting images of police violence disseminated by verified accounts in India. In comparison, the Kudankulam protest was constrained by technical issues given its rural and coastal location. The quantitative analysis reveals that emotion, rather than logic, is an essential factor in engagement. Qualitative analysis shows that the origin of a protest, whether rural or urban, influences how people assess its importance and whether they believe it deserves attention online. By demonstrating how protest movements shape the audience’s perceptions of a place as either marginal “anti-development” spaces or cosmopolitan centres of resistance, the study contributes to the epistemic discussion on digital communication practices and territorial branding. It argues that communicative justice and environmental justice are inextricably linked, emphasising the need for inclusive representational tactics that balance democratic citizenship, fairness, and territorial branding.
Downloads
References
Andrade, J. G., Sampaio, A., Garcia, J. E., Cairrão, Á., & Fonseca, M. J. S. da. (2024). Analyzing São Paulo’s place branding positioning in promotional videos (2017–2019). In Á. Rocha, H. Adeli, G. Dzemyda, F. Moreira, & A. Poniszewska-Marańda (Eds.), Good practices and new perspectives in information systems and technologies (pp. 110–116). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60328-0_11
Andrade, J. G., Sampaio, A., Garcia, J. E., & Fonseca, M. J. (2024). The city makes its mark in a review on digital communication and citizenship. In Á. Rocha, H. Adeli, G. Dzemyda, F. Moreira, & V. Colla (Eds.), Information systems and technologies (pp. 81–90). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45651-0_9
Arora, P. (2019). The next billion users: Digital life beyond the West. Harvard University Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
Cammaerts, B. (2015). Social media and activism. In R. Mansell & P. Hwa (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of digital communication and society (pp. 1027–1034). Wiley-Blackwell.
Costanza-Chock, S. (2012). Youth and social movements: Key lessons for allies. Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University; Born This Way Foundation.
Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. SAGE.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
Hutchins, B., & Lester, L. (2006). Environmental protest and tap-dancing with the media in the information age. Media, Culture & Society, 28(3), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706062911
Isin, E., & Ruppert, E. (2020). Being digital citizens. Rowman & Littlefield.
Joynes, J., & Dwivedy, A. K. (2025, July 13–17). From local outcry to global echo: A comparative analysis of digital activism in the Kudankulam anti-nuclear and Thoothukudi Sterlite protests [Conference presentation]. International Association for Media and Communication Research: Communicating Environmental Justice: Many Voices, One Planet, Nanyang, Singapore.
Joynes, J., & Vijay Kumar, V. (2025). The trust dilemma: Whom shall I believe? Navigating the narrative maze of the Israel-Palestine conflict through social media of mainstream news networks. Tripodos, (58), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2025.58.02
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. A. (2014). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. SAGE.
McDonald, K. (2013). Our violent world: Terrorism in society. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Mishra, D., Akbar, S. Z., Arya, A., Dash, S., Grover, R., & Pal, J. (2021). Rihanna versus Bollywood: Twitter influencers and the Indian farmers’ protest. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.04031
Napoli, P. (2019). Social media and the public interest: Media regulation in the disinformation age. Columbia University Press.
Nelkin, D. (1981). Nuclear power as a feminist issue. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 23(1), 14–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1981.9940928
Neuendorf, K. A. (2010). The content analysis guidebook. SAGE.
Nixon, R. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press.
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
Poell, T., & van Dijck, J. (2015). Social media and activist communication. In C. Atton (Ed.), The Routledge companion to alternative and community media (pp. 527–537). Routledge.
Reddy, C. R. (2019). The media in India and the Indian nuclear weapons policy 1998–2018: An abdication of responsibility. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 2(1), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2019.1618520
Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press.
Sindakis, S., & Showkat, G. (2024). The digital revolution in India: Bridging the gap in rural technology adoption. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00380-w
Sixto-García, J., Duarte-Melo, A., & Andrade, J. G. (2024). The relationship between the most consumed digital media in Portugal and audience participation mechanisms. Frontiers in Communication, 9, Article 1466140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1466140
Sundar, N. (2016). The burning forest: India’s war in Bastar. Juggernaut Books.
Thussu, D. K. (2000). International communication: Continuity and change. Arnold; Oxford University Press.
Thussu, D. K. (2009). Why internationalize media studies and how? In D. K. Thussu (Ed.), Internationalizing media studies (pp. 27–45). Routledge.
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
Udupa, S. (2019). Nationalism in the digital age: Fun as a metapractice of extreme speech. International Journal of Communication, 13, 3143–3163.
Waisbord, S. (2011). Between support and confrontation: Civic society, media reform, and populism in Latin America. Communication, Culture & Critique, 4(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01095.x
Waisbord, S. (2013). Reinventing professionalism: Journalism and news in global perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
Waisbord, S., & Mellado, C. (2014). De-Westernizing communication studies: A reassessment. Communication Theory, 24(4), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12044
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 J Joynes, Ashish Kumar Dwivedy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright, providing the journal with the right of first publication. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
