The Importance of Communication Design in the Process of Disseminating Community Practices in Social Neighbourhoods: The Balteiro
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.43(2023).4455Keywords:
communication design, community practices, social housing neighbourhoods, social design, universal designAbstract
This article aims to demonstrate how research in communication design can contribute to disseminating community practices in economically disadvantaged contexts, such as in social housing neighbourhoods. This study stems from the ECHO research project, where the main mission is to understand and document two self-initiated community practices in the social housing neighbourhood of Balteiro, in Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal, to disseminate them and foster their replication in similar social contexts. It begins with a literature review on the role of design on behalf of communities, focusing, in particular, on the concepts of social design and universal design, which substantiate the relevance and pertinence of the issue under study. Then, it describes the case study of Balteiro. It presents the methodologies adopted in this research, namely the interviews conducted to learn about the history of the two community practices. This provided the basis for developing a preliminary study for an online platform and a series of documentary films. This study proved the importance of involving designers in this dissemination process through multidisciplinary teams. The research work in the field should be close to the community, the institutions and the different social actors involved to understand the complexity of the study context and define how design should operate. The empirical experience from this study has shown that work in the social area should be developed locally, focused on small communities or informal organisations, and aware that results are achieved slowly and gradually.
Downloads
References
Antunes, G. (2019). Política de habitação social em Portugal: De 1974 à actualidade. Forum Sociológico, 34, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.4000/sociologico.4662
Armstrong, L., Bailey, J., Julier, G., & Kimbell, L. (2014). Social design futures: HEI research and the AHRC. University of Brighton.
Banks, M., & Zeitlyn, D. (2015). Visual methods in social research. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921702
Barboza, E. M., & Nunes, E. M. de A. (2007). The Brazilian governmental websites and its readability to users with low literacy level. Inclusão Social, 2(2), 19–33. https://revista.ibict.br/inclusao/article/view/1599
Chen, D.-S., Cheng, L.-L., Hummels, C., & Koskinen, I. (2016). Social design: An introduction. International Journal of Design, 10(1), 1–5.
Coleman, R., Clarkson, J., Dong, H., & Cassim, J. (Eds.). (2007). Design for inclusivity: A practical guide to accessible, innovative and user-centred design. Gower.
Coutinho, C. P. (2013). Metodologia de investigação em ciências sociais e humanas: Teoria e prática (2.ª ed.). Edições Almedina.
Coutinho, C. P., & Chaves, J. H. (2002). O estudo de caso na investigação em tecnologia educativa em Portugal. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 15(1), 221–243.
De Carlo, G. (2005). Architecture’s public. In P. B. Jones, D. Petrescu, & J. Till (Eds.), Architecture and participation (1.ª ed., pp. 3–22). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203022863
Del Gaudio, C., Franzato, C., & Oliveira, A. (2016). Sharing design agency with local partners in participatory design. International Journal of Design, 10(1), 53–64.
Erskine, R. (1968). Architecture and town planning in the north. Polar Record, 14(89), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003224740005659X
Fernandes, L. (1998). O sítio das drogas. Editorial Notícias.
Fernandes, L., & Mata, S. (2015). Viver nas “periferias desqualificadas”: Do que diz a literatura às perceções de interventores comunitários. Ponto Urbe, 16, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4000/pontourbe.2658
Freixo, M. J. V. (2012). Metodologia científica: Fundamentos, métodos e técnicas. Instituto Piaget.
Guimarães, L., Martins, N., Pereira, L., Penedos-Santiago, E., & Brandão, D. (2023). Interface design guidelines for low literate users: A literature review. In Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Education and E-Learning (pp. 29–35). ICPS; IJIET. https://doi.org/10.1145/3578837.3578842
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice (4.ª ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315146027
Hepburn, L.-A. (2022). Transdisciplinary learning in a design collaboration. The Design Journal, 25(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2022.2048986
Irwin, T., Kossoff, G., & Tonkinwise, C. (2015). Transition design provocation. Design Philosophy Papers, 13(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085688
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
Koskinen, I., & Hush, G. (2016). Utopian, molecular and sociological social design. International Journal of Design, 10(1), 65–71.
Kuure, E., & Miettinen, S. (2017). Social design for service. Building a framework for designers working in the development context. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S3464–S3474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352850
Margolin, V., & Margolin, S. (2002). A “social model” of design: Issues of practice and research. Design Issues, 18(4), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793602320827406
Martins, N., Brandão, D., Penedos-Santiago, E., Alvelos, H., Lima, C., Barreto, S., & Roberti, A. (2022). Self-initiated practices in the urban community of Balteiro: Design challenges in a post-pandemic setting. In A. G. Ho (Ed.), Human factors in communication of design: Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Human Factors in Communication of Design (pp. 1–7). AHFE International Open Access. http://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002029
Mata, S., & Fernandes, L. (2019). Revisitação aos atores e territórios psicotrópicos do Porto: Olhares etnográficos no espaço de 20 anos. Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais, 19(1), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2019.1.30
Mollison, B. (1988). Permaculture: Designer’s manual. Tagari Publications.
Nielsen, J. (2005, 13 de março). Lower-literacy users: Writing for a broad consumer audience. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/writing-for-lower-literacy-users/
Nold, C., Kaszynska, P., Bailey, J., & Kimbell, L. (2022). Twelve potluck principles for social design. Discern: International Journal of Design for Social Change, Sustainable Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 31–43. https://www.designforsocialchange.org/journal/index.php/DISCERN-J/article/view/75
Papanek, V. (1972). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. Pantheon Books.
Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: A study of economics as if people mattered. Blond & Briggs.
Sellberg, M. M., Cockburn, J., Holden, P. B., & Lam, D. P. M. (2021). Towards a caring transdisciplinary research practice: Navigating science, society and self. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 292–305. http://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1931452
Shea, A. (2012). Designing for social change: Strategies for community-based graphic design. Princeton Architectural Press.
Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive surplus: Creativity and generosity in a connected age. Penguin Press.
Simmons, C. (2011). Just design: Socially conscious design for critical causes. Adams Media.
Sousa, M. J. & Baptista, C. S. (2011). Como fazer investigação, dissertações, teses e relatórios. Pactor.
Story, M. F. (1998). Maximizing usability: The principles of universal design. Assistive Technology, 101, 4–12. http://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1998.10131955
Thies, I. M. (2014). User interface design for low-literate and novice users: Past, present and future. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 8(1), 1–72. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000047
Tinkler, P. (2013). Using photographs in social and historical research. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288016
Tromp, N., & Vial, S. (2022). Five components of social design: A unified framework to support research and practice. The Design Journal, 26(2), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2022.2088098
Vágvölgyi, R., Coldea, A., Dresler, T., Schrader, J., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2016). A review about functional illiteracy: Definition, cognitive, linguistic, and numerical aspects. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Artigo 1617. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01617
Wrench, W. M. (2012). Design and evaluation of illustrated information leaflets as an educational tool for low-literate asthma patients [Dissertação de mestrado, Rhodes University]. SEALS.
Zaphiris, P., Kurniawan, S., & Ghiawadwala, M. (2007). A systematic approach to the development of research-based web design guidelines for older people. Universal Access in the Information Society, 6(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0054-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nuno Martins, Daniel Brandão, Leonor Guimarães, Eliana Penedos-Santiago, Emílio Brandão
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright, providing the journal with the right of first publication. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.