Fact-Checking and Journalistic Authority in Brazil: An Analysis of Fato ou Fake and Estadão Verifica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.46(2024).5665Keywords:
political journalism, objectivity, fact-checking, Bolsonaro, LulaAbstract
In order to understand how mainstream media companies utilise fact-checking services, this paper investigates the following research question: to what extent did the Brazilian agencies Estadão Verifica and Fato ou Fake endeavour to reinforce their epistemic authority through fact-checking during the administrations of Jair Bolsonaro (2019–2022) and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (2023–present)? For this examination, all texts published by the two agencies that mentioned Jair Bolsonaro in their titles between January and May 2022 and Lula between January and May 2023 were collected. The corpus consisted of 119 checks (95 from Estadão Verifica and 24 from Fato ou Fake) and was subjected to content analysis. The data indicates that the agencies’ coverage focused on similar issues during the two administrations, with more than half of the publications refuting rumours detrimental to Lula. The results also reveal that the fact-checking process prioritises journalism’s own sources. In other words, Estadão Verifica and Fato ou Fake primarily relied on their own material or that of other mainstream media companies to verify the selected stories — this approach suggests limits to the transparency of the investigation, since much of the information used has already undergone editorial filtering, which is not always clear to the public.
Downloads
References
Adair, B., & Iannucci, R. (2017, 7 de junho). Heroes or hacks: The partisan divide over fact-checking. Duke Reporters Lab. https://reporterslab.org/heroes-hacks-partisan-divide-fact-checking/
Albuquerque, A. (2019). Protecting democracy or conspiring against it? Media and politics in Latin America: A glimpse from Brazil. Journalism, 20(7), 906–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917738376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917738376
Albuquerque, A. (2021). The two sources of the illiberal turn in Brazil. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 27(2), 127–144.
Associação Brasileira de Jornalismo Investigativo. (2022). Monitoramento de ataques a jornalistas no Brasil: Relatório 2021. https://abraji.org.br/publicacoes/relatorio-monitoramento-de-ataques-a-jornalistas-no-brasil
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo (L. A. Reto & A. Pinheiro, Trads.). Edições 70. (Trabalho original publicado em 1977)
Bartholomew, J. (2022, 19 de setembro). The rise and rise of partisan local newsrooms. Columbia Journalism Review. https://www.cjr.org/tow_center/the-rise-of-partisan-local-newsrooms.php
Becker, D. (2019). A evolução do fact-checking como atividade jornalística no Brasil: Lacunas e tendências. Comunicação: Reflexões, Experiências, Ensino, 15(1), 85–98.
Bramatti, D. (2021, 13 de outubro). Estadão Verifica já desmentiu 642 boatos na pandameia. Estadão. https://www.estadao.com.br/politica/estadao-novo-impresso-verifica/
Carlson, M. (2016). Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. Communication Theory, 26(4), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12088
Christofoletti, R. (2021). O que pensam os jornalistas brasileiros sobre a transparência das suas práticas? Revista FAMECOS, 28(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2021.1.40656 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2021.1.40656
Clayman, S., Heritage, J., Elliott, M. N., & McDonald, L. (2007). When does the watchdog bark? Conditions of aggressive questioning in presidential news conferences. American Sociological Review, 72(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200102
Estado de Minas. (2022, 9 de novembro). Lula sobre jornalistas: ‘Não vão ser mais ofendidas por um presidente’. Diario de Pernambuco. https://www.diariodepernambuco.com.br/noticia/politica/2022/11/lula-sobre-jornalistas-nao-vao-ser-mais-ofendidas-por-um-presidente.html
Fernández-Roldán, A., Elías, C., Santiago-Caballero, C., & Teira, D. (2023). Can we detect bias in political fact-checking? Evidence from a Spanish case study. Journalism Practice, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2262444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2262444
Ferracioli, P. (2021). Checagem de fatos, transparência pública e atuação política do jornalismo: Um estudo comparado sobre os sistemas de mídia de Brasil, Estados Unidos, Alemanha e Itália [Tese de doutoramento, Universidade Federal do Paraná]. Acervo Digital da UFPR. https://hdl.handle.net/1884/71412
Ferracioli, P., Kniess, A. B., & Marques, F. P. J. (2022). The watchdog role of fact-checkers in different media systems. Digital Journalism, 10(5), 717–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.2021377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.2021377
Fontes, G. S. (2022). Populismo e autoridade jornalística: Uma análise de editoriais e notícias publicados durante a primeira metade do governo Bolsonaro [Tese de doutoramento, Universidade Federal do Paraná]. Acervo Digital da UFPR. https://hdl.handle.net/1884/76368
Fontes, G. S., Ferracioli, P., & Kniess, A. B. (2019). Fake news e fact-checkind nas eleições presidenciais de 2018: Um estudo qualitativo sobre o projeto Comprova. In Anais do VIII Compolítica (pp. 1–23). UnB. http://compolitica.org/novo/anais/2019_gt2_Fontes.pdf
Gehrke, M. (2020, 20–21 de março). Transparency as a key element of data journalism: Perceptions of Brazilian professionals [Apresentação de comunicação]. Computation + Journalism Symposium, Boston, Estados Unidos da América. https://bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.northeastern.edu/dist/d/53/files/2020/02/CJ_2020_paper_8.pdf
Graves, L. (2018). Boundaries not drawn: Mapping the institutional roots of the global fact-checking movement. Journalism Studies, 19(5), 613–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1196602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1196602
Graves, L., & Konieczna, M. (2015). Sharing the news: Journalistic collaboration as field repair. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1966–1984.
Graves, L., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2016). Understanding innovations in journalistic practice: A field experiment examining motivations for fact-checking. Journal of Communication, 66(1), 102–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12198
G1 lança Fato ou Fake, novo serviço de checagem de conteúdos suspeitos. (2018, 30 de julho). G1. https://g1.globo.com/fato-ou-fake/noticia/2018/07/30/g1-lanca-fato-ou-fake-novo-servico-de-checagem-de-conteudos-suspeitos.ghtml
Koliska, M., Chadha, K., & Burns, A. (2020). Talking back: Journalists defending attacks against their profession in the Trump era. Journalism Studies, 21(11), 1496–1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1763190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1763190
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. SAGE.
Lelo, T. (2022). The Brazilian fact-checking landscape under the platforms’ guidance. Journal of Human Mediated Interactions, 23(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2069588 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2069588
Lim, C. (2018). Checking how fact-checkers check. Research & Politics, 5(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018786848 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018786848
Lopes, R. (2023, 12 de janeiro). Os bastidores do primeiro café da manhã de Lula com a imprensa depois da posse. Zero Hora. https://gauchazh.clicrbs.com.br/colunistas/rodrigo-lopes/noticia/2023/01/os-bastidores-do-primeiro-cafe-da-manha-de-lula-com-a-imprensa-depois-da-posse-clctm5igy00460181gs8xewn9.html
Lula. (2023, 12 de janeiro). Café da manhã do presidente Lula com jornalistas [Vídeo]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rdtxny-lTMw
Marques, F. P. J. (2023). Populism and critical incidents in journalism: Has Bolsonaro disrupted the mainstream press in Brazil? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 29(4), 825–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612231153110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612231153110
Marques, F. P. J., Ferracioli, P., Comel, N., & Kniess, A. B. (2024). Who is who in fact-checked conspiracy theories? Disseminators, sources, and the struggle for authority in polarized environments. Journalism, 25(4), 856–880. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231165579 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231165579
Marques, F. P. J., Miola, E., Vos, T. P., Fontes, G. S., & Santos, D. H. (2023). “Fake news” and journalistic authority in newspaper editorials. Journalism Studies, 24(8), 1087–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2214941 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2214941
Massuchin, M. G., Orso, M., Moura, J. F., & Saleh, D. M. (2022). “Trash!”, “Leftist!”, “Scumbag!”, “#Fakenews”, but not so much: Attacks and criticism towards media institutions and strategic use of journalism by online far-right activism in Brazil. Brazilian Journalism Research, 18(3), 492–523. https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v18n3.2022.1533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v18n3.2022.1533
Mick, J. (2019). Profissionalismo e confiança: O curioso caso do país que acredita mais nos jornalistas do que na mídia. Política & Sociedade, 18(43), 242–260. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2019v18n43p242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2019v18n43p242
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Reuters Institute Digital news report 2023. Reuters Institute; University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2023/dnr-executive-summary
Nicoletti, J., & Flores, A. M. M. (2022). Violence against journalists on Jair Bolsonaro’s YouTube channel: Analysis of the first 100 days of the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil. Brazilian Journalism Research, 18, 4–35. https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v18n1.2022.1438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v18n1.2022.1438
Pimentel, P. (2023). A narrativa e os enquadramentos do Estadão sobre o “lulopetismo” uma perspectiva crítica latino-americana. Sobre Jornalismo, 12(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.25200/SLJ.V12.N1.2023.542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25200/SLJ.v12.n1.2023.542
Poynter. (s.d.-a). About the International Fact-Checking Network. Retirado a 26 de fevereiro de 2024, de https://www.poynter.org/ifcn/about-ifcn/
Poynter. (s.d.-b). International Fact-Checking Network: Empowering fact-checkers worldwide. Retirado a 26 de fevereiro de 2024, de https://www.poynter.org/ifcn/
Reese, S. D. (2022). The institution of journalism: Conceptualizing the press in a hybrid media system. Digital Journalism, 10(2), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1977669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1977669
Santos, C. R. P., & Maurer, C. (2020). Potencialidades e limites do fact-checking no combate à desinformação. Comunicação & Informação, 23, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5216/ci.v23i.57839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5216/ci.v23i.57839
Seibt, T., & Fonseca, V. P. D. S. (2019). Transparência como princípio normativo do jornalismo: A prática de fact-checking no Brasil. Comunicação Pública, 14(27), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4000/cp.4806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/cp.4806
Silva, G., Vogel, D., & Silva, T. (2022). Apuração, redação e edição jornalística. Editora UFSC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/978-65-5805-072-8
Uscinski, J. E., & Butler, R. W. (2013). The epistemology of fact checking. Critical Review, 25(2), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2013.843872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2013.843872
Waisbord, S. (2018). Truth is what happens to news. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1866–1878. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492881
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andressa Butture Kniess, Naiza Comel, Francisco Paulo Jamil Marques
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright, providing the journal with the right of first publication. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
