Meeting the Challenges of Designing Multimodal Texts to Promote Multiliteracies Pedagogy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.43(2023).4481Keywords:
multiliteracies, multimodality, interculturality, digital literacy, interactive story appsAbstract
This article aims to add to the understanding of the challenges involved in designing digital texts to promote multiliteracies pedagogy. A multiliteracies approach calls for multimodal meaning-making and cultural diversity to be integrated into new school curriculum content, and accordingly, we analyse an interactive children’s story app, named Mobeybou in Brazil. The research question addressed was: what can we learn about the design of multimodal texts aimed at promoting intercultural learning from the design of this story app? The app incorporates tangible and digital storytelling materials to promote intercultural skills among young children, focusing specifically on Brazil. Mobeybou in Brazil was studied to characterize the design of its multimodal representations of meaning, using categories from the grammar of storytelling and multimodal meaning-making, particularly those concerned with representing the experiential diversity and personal positioning of the app users. The findings provide evidence of the complexity involved in designing multimodal texts to meet the challenges of promoting multiliteracies pedagogy, highlighting the urgent need to narrow the interface between research undertaken in education, semiotics, and digital media design. The article concludes by identifying the study’s limitations and some future developments.
Downloads
References
Bal, M. (2017). Narratology. Introduction to the theory of narrative. University of Toronto Press.
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication. A social semiotic frame. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687537
Brasil, J. A., & Cabecinhas, R. (2019). Intercultural dialogue and intergroup relations in Europe: Contributions of cultural studies and social psychology. Comunicação e Sociedade, 105–118. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.0(2019).3063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.0(2019).3063
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies, 4(3),164–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
Council of Europe. (2008). Living together as equals in dignity [White paper]. Council of Europe Ministers of Foreign Affairs.
Frederico, A. (2021). Reading an app: Dimensions of meaning-making in digital literary reading in early childhood. Perspectiva, 39(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-795X.2021.e66013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-795X.2021.e66013
Gee, J. P. (2007). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourse (3.ª ed.). Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203944806
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
Gil, M., Pereira, í. S. P., & Sylla, C. (no prelo). La construcción del posicionamiento lector en una narrativa digital interactiva. Una discusión a la luz de la teoría de las multiliteracidades. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación.
Hagen, A., & Mills, K. A. (2022). Rhythm in literary apps. Visual Communication. Publicação eletrónica antecipada. https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572221078038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572221078038
Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2012). New learning. Elements of a science of education. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139248532
Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. Routledge.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images. The grammar of visual design. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728
Kulju, P., Kupiainen, R., Wiseman, A. M., Jyrkiäinen, A., Koskinen-Sinisalo, K.-L., & Mäkinen, M. (2018). A review of multiliteracies pedagogy in primary classrooms. Language and Literacy, 20(2), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.20360/langandlit29333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20360/langandlit29333
Lim, F. V., Toh, W., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2022). Multimodality in the English language classroom: A systematic review of literature. Linguistics and Education, 69, 101048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101048
Lim, F. V., Towndrow, P. A., & Min Tan, J. (2021). Unpacking the teachers’ multimodal pedagogies in the primary English language classroom in Singapore. RELC Journal. Publicação eletrónica antecipada. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211011783 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211011783
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Genre relations. Mapping culture. Equinox.
Martins, M. de L., Marques, M. A., & Ramos, R. (2020). Discursos sobre migrantes, refugiados e minorias na esfera pública: O século XXI em debate. Comunicação e Sociedade, 38, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.38(2020).3134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.38(2020).3134
Mills, K. (2016). Literacy theories for the digital age: Social, critical, multimodal, spatial, material and sensory lenses. Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783094639
Mills, K., Unsworth, L., & Scholes, L. (2023). Literacy for digital futures: Mind, body, text. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003137368
Mobeybou. (2020). Mobeybou in Brazil (6.8) [Jogo].
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies (pp. 1–28). Routledge.
O’Brien, A. (2014). Using focalisation to manipulate audience viewpoint in 3-D animation narratives: What do student authors need to know? In L. Unsworth & A. Thomas (Eds.), English teaching and new literacies pedagogy. Interpreting and authoring digital multimodal narratives (pp. 123–150). Peter Lang.
Painter, C., Martin, J. R., & Unsworth, L. (2012). Reading visual narratives: Image analysis of children’s picture books. Equinox.
Pereira, Í. S. P. (2019). Para uma pedagogia da leitura realizada on-line para construir conhecimento. Texto Digital, 15(2), 28–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1807-9288.2019v15n2p28
Pereira, Í. S. P., Gil, M., & Sylla, C. (2022). Para a construção da teoria dos multiletramentos. Dimensões ideacionais (e implicações pedagógicas) da multimodalidade textual numa storyapp para crianças. Calidoscópio, 20(1), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.4013/cld.2022.201.04
Rowsell, J., Kress, G., Pahl, K., & Street, B. (2013). The social practice of multimodal reading: A new literacy studies – Multimodal perspective on reading. In D. E. Alvermann, N. Unrau, & R.B. Rudell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 1182–1207). International Reading Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/0710.43
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). The primacy of movement. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.14
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2011). Embodied minds or mindful bodies? A question of fundamental, inherently inter-related aspects of animation. Subjectivity, 4, 451–466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2011.21
Silva, A. M., Cabecinhas, R., & Evans, R. (2019). Cultures, memories, dialogues under construction. Comunicação e Sociedade, 13–17. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.0(2019).3057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.0(2019).3057
Stein, P. (2008). Multimodal pedagogies in diverse classrooms. Representations, rights and resources. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203935804
Sylla, C., Gil, M., & Pereira, Í. S. P. (2022). Narrating by doing: A bridging concept for understanding and informing the design of tangible interfaces for storytelling. Interacting with Computers, 33(6), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwac016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwac016
United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development, A/RES/70/1. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/291/89/PDF/N1529189.pdf?OpenElement
Unsworth, L. (2006). Towards a metalanguage for multiliteracies education: Describing the meaning-making resources of language-image interaction. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 5(1), 55–76.
Wilson, F. R. (1998). The hand: How its use shapes the brain, language, and human culture (1.ª ed.). Pantheon Books.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625– 636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322
Zhao, S., & Unsworth, L. (2016). Touch design and narrative interpretation: A social semiotic approach to picture book apps. In N. Kucirkova & G. Falloon (Eds.), Apps, Technology and Younger Learners: International evidence for teaching (pp. 89–102). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Íris Susana Pires Pereira, Maitê Gil, Cristina Maria Sylla
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright, providing the journal with the right of first publication. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.