O papel dos profissionais de relações públicas na responsabilidade social corporativa: algumas notas a partir da realidade portuguesa

Mafalda Eiró-Gomes; Ana  Raposo

doi:10.17231/comsoc.0(2020).2742

Authors

Mafalda Eiró-Gomes Public Relations and Organizational Communication Department, College of Communication and Media Studies, Polytechnic Institute of Lisbon, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5542-6995
Ana Raposo Public Relations and Organizational Communication Department, College of Communication and Media Studies, Polytechnic Institute of Lisbon, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6740-4566

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.0(2020).2742

Keywords:

public relations, corporate citizenship, corporate social responsibility

Abstract

Are public relations (PR) professionals involved in the decision-making processes concerning corporate citizenship (CC) or are they only asked to report the organizations’ best practices? Are organizations committed to corporate social responsibility (CSR) or corporate citizenship? In the framework of a pragmatist paradigm, a sequential explanatory mixed methods approach was developed. This method is a two-phase design that is characterized by an initial quantitative phase of data collection and analysis, followed by a qualitative phase of data collection and analysis. An invitation to answer an online survey was sent to all 158 organizations that belonged to an association for the promotion of CSR in Portugal (Grace), in October 2018. Afterwards, face-to-face interviews with the CSR/CC responsible were conducted to those organizations that answered the survey. The research showed that the social (philanthropic) area emerged as the most relevant one in all the organizations interviewed, even though the area seems to be under strong reformulations. Corporations tend to choose CSR as the main concept and dislike the concept of corporate citizenship, that is, the idea of being both a social and political actor. PR practitioners seem to have fewer responsibilities than those the researchers expected to find out, at least at a strategic level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Argenti, P. (2007). Corporate communication. Nova Iorque: McGraw Hill/Irwin.

Broom, G. & Sha, B. (2013). Cutlip and center’s effective public relations. Harlow: Prentice-Hall.

Comissão Europeia. (2001). Green paper: promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Bruxelas: Comissão das Comunidades Europeias.

Creswell, J. (2014). Research design - qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Creswell, J. & Creswell. D. (2018). Research design - qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Daymon, C. & Holloway, I. (2002). Qualitative research methods in public relations and marketing communications. Nova Iorque: Routledge.

Dozier, D. (1992). The organizational roles of communications and public relations practitioners. In J. Grunig (Eds.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp.327-356). Nova Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Eiró-Gomes, M. & Lourenço, S. (2009, abril). O papel e a responsabilidade das relações públicas na sustentabilidade de um mundo global. Comunicação apresentada no 8º Congresso da Lusocom/6º Congresso da Sopcom, Lisboa.

Frolova, I. & Lapina, I. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in the framework of quality management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 178-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.166

Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 122-126.

Herzig, C. & Kuhn, A. (2017). Corporate responsibility reporting. In A. Rasche; M. Morsing & J. Moon (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: strategy, communication, governance (pp.186-218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kott, S. (2017). La citoyenneté sociale. In E. François & T. Serrier (Eds.), Notre histoire - l’héritage européenne depuis Homero (pp.187-199). Paris: Les Arènes.

Hulme, D. & Arun, T. (2009). The future of microfinance. In D. Hulme & T. Arun (Eds.), Microfinance: a reader (pp. 225-232). Londres: Routledge.

Lourenço, S. (2009). Relações Públicas e mudança social: a sua importância e o seu papel no desenvolvimento de projectos sustentáveis. Dissertação de Mestrado, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal. Retirado de https://repositorio.ipl.pt/handle/10400.21/806

Matten, D. & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404-424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458

Maxwell, J. (2013). Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Moon, J. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford OUP.

Morsing, M. (2017). CSR communication: what is it? Why is it important? In A. Rasche; M. Morsing & J. Moon (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: strategy, communication, governance (pp. 281-306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Patten, A. (2005). Should we stop thinking about poverty in terms of helping the poor? Ethics & International Affairs, 19(1), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2005.tb00486.x

Prout, C. H. (1997). Organisation and function of the corporate public relations department. In P. Lesly (Ed.), Lesly’s handbook of public relations and communications (pp. 685-695). Chicago: Contemporary Books.

Rasche, A., Morsing, M. & Moon, J. (Eds.) (2017). Corporate social responsibility: strategy, communication, governance. Cambridge: University Press, UK.

Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Londres: Sage Publications.

Santos, M. & Eiró-Gomes, M. (2017). Organizações cidadãs: para além da responsabilidade social corporativa. In C. Camponez; F. Pinheiro; J. Fernandes; M. Gomes & R. Sobreira (Eds.), Comunicação e transformações sociais: comunicação política, comunicação organizacional e institucional, cultura visual (pp. 208-218). Coimbra: SOPCOM.

Santos, M. & Eiró-Gomes, M. (2016). Empresas cidadãs e comunicação: uma nova era no âmbito da responsabilidade social corporativa. In C. Gerbase & J. Tonin (Eds.), Janelas para o mundo: telas do imaginário - bra resultante do XIII Seminário Internacional de Comunicação (pp. 233-246). Porto Alegre: Sulina.

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. California: Sage Publications.

Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. Nova Iorque: Teachers College Press.

Schultz, M. & Hatch J. (2000). Introduction: why expressive organization?. In M. Schultz; M. Hatch & M. Larsen (Eds.), The expressive organization – linking identity, reputation and corporate brand (pp. 1-10). Oxford: University Press.

Skinner, C., Essen, L., Mersham, G. & Motau,S. (2007). Handbook of public relations. Oxford: University Press.

Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: the new dangerous class. Londres: Bloomsbury.

Standing, G. (2014). A precariat charter - from denizens to citizens. Londres: Bloomsbury.

Stangis, D. & Smith, K. (2017). The executive’s guide to 21st century corporate citizenship - how your company ca win the battle for reputation and impact. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.

Steyn, B. & Puth, G. (2000). Corporate communication strategy. Joanesburgo: Heinemann.

Tirole, J. (2016). Economie du bien commun. Paris: Puf.

Verhezen, P. (2015). The vulnerability of corporate reputation: leadership for sustainable long-term value. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.

Waddoc, S. (2003). Editoral. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (11), 3-4. Retirado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jcorpciti.11.3.pdf

Whelan, G. (2017). Political CSR: the corporation as a political actor. In A. Rasche; M. Morsing & J. Moon (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: strategy, communication, governance (pp. 136-153). Cambridge: University Press.

White, J. & Mazur, L. (1995). Strategic communications management – making PR work. Singapura: The Economist Intelligence Unit.

Woot, P. (2013). Repenser l’entreprise - compétitivité, technologie et société. (n.l.): Royal Academy of Belgium.

Woot, P. (2016). Maîtriser le progrès économique et technique: la force des choses et la responsabilité des hommes. (n.l.): Royal Academy of Belgium.

Wilcox, D.L., Cameron, G.T. & Xifra, J. (2012). Relaciones públicas - estrategias y tácticas. Madrid: Pearson Educación.