Changing Forms of Ownership in a Democratic Corporatist Media System — How Digitalization Leads to Less Transparency and the Risk of Media Capture

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.46(2024).5691

Keywords:

media ownership, media capture, democratic corporatist media system, digitalization, transparency

Abstract

Digitalization has led to a crisis in news media and an upheaval in media ownership. A research concern has been that the motives driving media owners will shift from financial and public service to overtly political and ideological. The term “media capture” has been suggested to describe how various interests may take control over news media outlets. This paper adds to the study of digitalization and media ownership in three ways. First, our analysis is based on new analytical parameters developed as part of the Euromedia Ownership Monitor. Second, we compare types of ownership across legacy news media and digital news media, as each media type runs a different risk regarding capture. Third, we focus on ownership transparency, especially that of beneficial owners. Our case study is Denmark, which is part of the democratic corporatist media system and, based on international ratings, is one of the most democratic and transparent media systems in Europe. We find that private legacy news media is mostly owned by nonprofit foundations, while legacy public service news media is owned by the State or is listed as self-owned. Regarding new digital news media, we find different ownership forms. However, only new digital news media have ownership by a sole proprietor. Regarding transparency, we find the transparency of direct and beneficial owners is more accessible in legacy news media than in new, digital news media. We find no tradition for publishing “natural persons” possible affiliations to either political or other commercial interests. This seems especially relevant, as new digital news media outlets, unlike legacy media, sometimes are owned and funded by private investors, whose main business interests lie outside the news media and whose motives for owning a news media may differ from traditional ownership thus leading to a risk of media capture by ownership.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mark Blach-Ørsten, Department of Communication & Arts, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark

Mark Blach-Ørsten is professor of Journalism at Roskilde University. His research interests focus on questions about media and democracy including political communication, media use, journalism ethics, media systems, lobbyism, media ownership, election coverage and Europeanization.

Ida Willig, Department of Communication & Arts, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark

Ida Willig is professor and dean of Humanities at Roskilde University. Her research field is media sociology and she has published extensively on journalism, news production and lobbyism.

Mads Kæmsgaard, Department of Communication & Arts, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark

Mads Kæmsgaard Eberholst is a lecturer in Journalism at Roskilde University. His research interest include media use, media ownership, Europeanization and election coverage.

Rasmus Burkal, Independent researcher, Denmark

Rasmus Burkal is an independent researcher. His focus is on journalism and credibility, letters to the editor, election coverage and media ownership.

References

Agence France Presse. (2024, March 21). Italy agency reporters strike over right-wing takeover fears. Barron’s. https://www.barrons.com/news/italy-agency-reporters-strike-over-right-wing-takeover-fears-a17ebcde

Albrecht, J (2021, November 15). Mads Brüggers pengemand: ’Skattelykonge’ er gemt i et virvar af betalt ros på Google. Journalisten. https://journalisten.dk/mads-bruggers-pengemand-skattelykonge-er-gemt-i-et-virvar-af-betalt-ros-paa-google/

Antoniou, A., Arena, A., Cole, M. D., Etteldorf, C., Flynn, R., Kamina, P., Llorens, C., Lukyanov, R., Piolino, M., Ukrow, J., Wojciechowski, K., Woods, L., & Zeitzmann, S. (2021). Transparency of media ownership. IRIS Special. European Audiovisual Observatory. https://rm.coe.int/iris-special-2021-02en-transparency-of-media-ownership/1680a57bf0

Arriaza Ibarra, K., & Nord, L. W. (2014). Public service media under pressure: Comparing government policies in Spain and Sweden 2006–2012. Javnost - The Public, 21(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2014.11009140

Besley, T., & Prat, A. (2006). Handcuffs for the grabbing hand? Media capture and government accountability. American Economic Review, 96(3), 720–736. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.3.720

Benson, R. (2017). Can foundations solve the journalism crisis? Journalism Studies, 11(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917724612

Benson, R. (2018). Rethinking the sociology of media ownership. In L. Grindstaff, M.-C. M. Lo, & J. R. Hall (Eds.), Routledge handbook of cultural sociology (pp. 387–396). Routledge.

Benson, R., Neff, T., & Hessérus, M. (2018). Media ownership and public service news: How strong are institutional logics? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(3), 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218782740

Bjørn Høi Jensen ny bestyrelsesformand i CEPOS. (2012, April 24). Altinget. https://www.altinget.dk/navnenyt/bjoern-hoei-jensen-ny-bestyrelsesformand-i-cepos

Blach-Ørsten, M., Burkal, R., Mayerhöffer, E., & Willig, I. (2021). Denmark: High media independence and informal democratic traditions in the newsroom. In J. Trappel & T. Tomaz (Eds.), The Media for Democracy Monitor 2021: How leading news media survive digital transformation (pp. 147–176). Nordicom.

Blach-Ørsten, M., & Lund, A. B. (2015). Troværdig journalistik: Et spørgsmål om etik og nøjatighed. Samfundslitteratur.

Blach-Ørsten, M., & Mayerhöffer, E. (2021). Det politiske informationslandskab i Danmark 2.0. Politica, 53(2), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v53i2.130381

Brems, M. K. (2023). From stark opposition to partial adaption: How 12 Danish alternative media construct and position themselves vis-à-vis the media-and political mainstream. Journalistica, 17(1), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v17i1.134823

Brüggemann, M., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Humprecht, E., & Castro, L. (2014). Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of Western media systems. Journal of Communication, 64(6), 1037–1065.

Brügger, M. (2021, November 22). Luxemburg tur/retur. Fri Mads. https://frihedsbrevet.dk/fri-mads-26-luxembourg-tur-retur/

Dodman, B. (2023, July 11). France’s Murdoch? Right-wing media swoop threatens ‘pillar of French democracy’. France 24. https://www.france24.com/en/france/20230711-france-s-murdoch-right-wing-media-swoop-threatens-pillar-of-french-democracy

Doyle, G. (2015). Why ownership pluralism still matters in a multi-platform world. In P. Valcke, M. Sükösd, & R. G. Picard (Eds.), Media pluralism and diversity: Concepts, risks and global trends (pp. 297–309). Palgrave Macmillan.

Dragomir, M., & Aslama Horowitz, M. (2021). Media capture and its contexts: Developing a comparative framework for public service media. In M. Túñez-López, F. Campos-Freire, & M. Rodríguez-Castro (Eds.), The values of public service media in the internet society (pp. 217–246).

Esmark, A., & Ørsten, M. (2008). Media and politics in Denmark. In J. Strömbäck, M. Ørsten, & T. Aalberg (Eds.), Communicating politics: Political communication in the Nordic countries (pp. 25–43). Nordicom.

European Commission. (2021, July 20). Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the council on the mechanisms to be put in place by the Member States for the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing and repealing Directive (EU) 2015/849. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:05758242-ead6-11eb-93a8-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF

Fernando, F., & Berkhout, M. R. (Eds.). (2022). Unmasking control: A guide to beneficial ownership transparency. International Monetary Fund.

Figueira, A., & Costa e Silva, E. (2023). Transparency as a quality dimension: Media ownership and the challenges of (in)visibility. Comunicação e Sociedade, 44, e023021. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.44(2023).4708

Friedberg, E. (2020, October 28). Forældrene flygtede fra nazisterne - Nu har Max selv pakket sin kuffert. Netavisen Pio. https://piopio.dk/foraeldrene-flygtede-fra-nazisterne-nu-har-max-selv-pakket-sin-kuffert

Gross, P., & Jakubowicz, K. (Eds.). (2012). Media transformations in the post-communist world: Eastern Europe’s tortured path to change. Rowman & Littlefield.

Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems. Cambridge University Press.

Hanitzsch, T., & Berganza, R. (2012). Explaining journalists’ trust in public institutions across 20 countries: Media freedom, corruption, and ownership matter most. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 794–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01663.x

Hitchens, L. P. (1994). Media ownership and control: A European approach. The Modern Law Review, 57(4), 585–601.

Holtz-Bacha, C. (2021). The kiss of death. Public service media under right-wing populist attack. European Journal of Communication, 36(3), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323121991334

Humphreys, P. (1996). Mass media and media policy in Western Europe (Vol. 2). Manchester University Press.

Humprecht, E. (2019). Ownership of news media. In T, Vos, V. Hanusch, D. Dimitrakopoulou, M. Geertsema-Sligh, & A. Sehl (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of journalism studies (pp. 1–20). Wiley-Blackwell.

Humprecht, E., & Esser, F. (2018). Diversity in online news: On the importance of ownership types and media system types. Journalism Studies, 19(12), 1825–1847. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1308229

Humprecht, E., Herrero L. C., Blassnig, C., Brüggemann, M., & Engesser, S. (2022). Media systems in the digital age: An empirical comparison of 30 countries. Journal of Communication, 72(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab054

Iyengar, S., Curran, J., Lund, A. B., Salovaara-Moring, I., Hahn, K. S., & Coen, S. (2010). Cross-national versus individual-level differences in political information: A media systems perspective. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 20(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2010.490707

Kammer, A. (2017). Market structure and innovation policies in Denmark. In H. van Kranenburg (Ed.), Innovation policies in the European news media industry: A comparative study (pp. 37–47). Springer.

Lange, R. (2023, November 6). Eks-pressechef i Nye Borgerlige køber mediet Kontrast - Selskab med milliongæld skal afvikles. Mediawatch. https://mediawatch.dk/Medienyt/article16564458.ece

Lund, A. B. (1976). Magten over Danmarks radio. PubliMus.

Lund, A. B. (2013). Mangfoldighed i dansk dagspresse: Et publicistisk serviceeftersyn. Center for Civilsamfunds-studier.

Masullo, G. M., Curry, A. L., Whipple, K. N., & Murray, C. (2022). The story behind the story: Examining transparency about the journalistic process and news outlet credibility. Journalism Practice, 16(7), 1287–1305. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1870529

Mathiessen, p. (2023, December 2). Her er hans hemmelige pengemænd. Ekstra Bladet. https://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/samfund/her-er-hans-hemmelige-pengemaend/10046899

Mayerhöffer, E. (2021). How do Danish right-wing alternative media position themselves against the mainstream? Advancing the study of alternative media structure and content. Journalism Studies, 22(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1814846

Meier, W. A., & Trappel, J. (2022). Media transparency: Comparing how leading news media balance the need for transparency with professional ethics. In J. Trappel & T. Tomaz (Eds.), Success and failure in news media performance: Comparative analysis in the Media for Democracy Monitor 2021 (pp. 255–273). Nordicom.

Neff, T., & Pickard, V. (2021). Funding democracy: Public media and democratic health in 33 countries. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 29(3), 601–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211060255

Nielsen, K. (2017). Media capture in the digital age. In A. Schiffrin (Ed.), In the service of power: Media capture and the threat to democracy (pp. 33–41). Center for International Media Assistance.

Neimanns, E. (2021). Welfare states, media ownership and attitudes towards redistribution. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(2), 234–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1986117

Noam, E. M. (Ed.). (2016). Who owns the world’s media? Media concentration and ownership around the world. Oxford University Press.

Olesen, T. (2020). Media and politics: The Danish media system in transformation? In P. M. Christiansen, J. Elklit, & P. Nedergaard (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Danish politics (pp. 417–432). Oxford University Press.

Olsen, E. R. (2023, November 3). Mediet Frihedsbrevet får nye millioner og nye investorer i jagt på sorte tal. Watchmedier. https://watchmedier.dk/nyheder/opkoeb/article16571137.ece

Rasmussen, C. S., Ahm, K., & Bollmann, A. T. (2022). Monitorering af mediepluralisme i den digitale tidsalder: Anvendelse af medie pluralisme monitor i den Europæiske Union, Albanien, Montenegro, Den Nordmakedonske Republik, Serbien og Tyrkiet i året 2021. Landerapport: Danmark. European University Institute.

Schiffrin, A. (2018). Introduction to special issue on media capture. Journalism, 19(8), 1033–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917725167

Schiffrin, A. (Ed.). (2021). Media capture: How money, digital platforms, and governments control the news. Columbia University Press.

Schmidt, S., & Sand, J. (2021, November 20). Afsløring: Pengemand flytter Brüggers medie i skattely. Ekstra Bladet. https://ekstrabladet.dk/underholdning/dkkendte/afsloering-pengemand-flytter-bruggers-medie-i-skattely/8993385

Schnyder, G., Radl, M., Toth, F., Kucukuzun, M., Turnšek, T., Çelik, B., & Pajnik, M. (2024). Theorizing and mapping media ownership networks in authoritarian-populist contexts: A comparative analysis of Austria, Hungary, Slovenia, and Turkey. Media, Culture & Society, 46(1), 38–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437231179366

Schrøder, K. C., Blach-Ørsten, M., & Kæmsgaard Eberholst, M. (2022). Danskernes brug har nyhedsmedier, 2022. Roskilde Universitet.

Schrøder, K. C., Blach-Ørsten, M., & Kæmsgaard Eberholst, M. (2023). Danskernes brug har nyhedsmedier, 2023. Roskilde Universitet.

Schudson, M. (2020). The shortcomings of transparency for democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(11), 1670–1678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220945347

Simonsen, S. (2023). Monitoring media pluralism in the digital era: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor in the European Union, Albania, Montenegro, the Republic of North Macedonia, Serbia and Turkey in the year 2022. Country report: Denmark. European University Institute.

Sjøvaag, H., & Ohlsson, J. (2024). Media ownership and journalism. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://oxfordre.com/communication/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-839

Shen, F. (2024, June 10). Baltimore Sun staffers protest after new owners begin publishing Fox45 stories in the newspaper. BaltimoreBrew. https://baltimorebrew.com/2024/06/10/baltimore-sun-staffers-protest-after-new-owners-begin-publishing-fox45-stories-in-the-newspaper/

Slots- og Kulturstyrelsen. (2014, July 15). Tilskudsmodtagere fra Innovationspuljen. https://slks.dk/omraader/medier/skrevne-medier-trykteweb/innovationspuljen/tilskudsmodtagere

Smith, R. C., Klimkiewicz, B., & Ostling, A. (2021). Media ownership transparency in Europe: Closing the gap between European aspiration and domestic reality. European Journal of Communication, 36(6), 547–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323121999523

Stetka, V. (2012). From multinationals to business tycoons: Media ownership and journalistic autonomy in Central and Eastern Europe. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(4), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212452449

Stiglitz, J. (2017). Toward a taxonomy of media capture. In A. Schiffrin (Ed.), In the service of power: Media capture and the threat to democracy (pp. 9–17). Center for International Media Assistance.

Sørensen, J. (2024, February 8). Hård kritik af mulig borgmesterkandidat: Lovprises i egen avis af sin bror. TV 2 Syd. https://www.tvsyd.dk/fredericia/haard-kritik-af-mulig-borgmesterkandidat-lovprises-i-egen-avis-af-sin-bror

Thomsen, S., Poulsen, T., Børsting, C., & Kuhn, J. (2018). Industrial foundations as long-term owners. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(3), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12236

Tomaz, T. (2024). Media ownership and control in Europe: A multidimensional approach. European Journal of Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231241270994

Tunstall, J., & Palmer, M. (1991). Media moguls. Routledge.

Willig, I., & Blach-Ørsten, M. (2017). Media pluralism monitor 2016: Monitoring risks for media pluralism in EU and beyond. Country report: Denmark. European University Institute.

Willig, I., & Blach-Ørsten, M. (2022). Magtudredninger og medier: Den nye magtudredning. Økonomi og Politik, 95(3–4), 76–87.

Willig, I., Blach-Ørsten, M., & Burkal, R. (2022). Denmark: Country report 2022. Euromedia Ownership Monitor. https://media-ownership.eu/findings/countries/denmark/

Wiseman, J. (2021, March 8). ‘The Hungary model’: How Poland copied illiberal tactics for weakening independent media. International Press Institute. https://ipi.media/the-hungary-model-how-poland-copied-illiberal-tactics-for-weakening-independent-media/

Published

2024-11-06

How to Cite

Blach-Ørsten, M., Willig, I., Kæmsgaard, M., & Burkal, R. (2024). Changing Forms of Ownership in a Democratic Corporatist Media System — How Digitalization Leads to Less Transparency and the Risk of Media Capture. Comunicação E Sociedade, 46, e024023. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.46(2024).5691

Issue

Section

Thematic Articles