“The Same Rigour, the Same Pluralism”: An Analysis of the “Transatlantic Partnership” Between Público and Folha de S. Paulo Newspapers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17231/volesp(2025).5431Keywords:
critical discourse analysis, Brazil, democracy, meta-journalism, PortugalAbstract
This paper is based on the premise that, through journalistic discourse, socially shared meanings and symbolic power disputes can be recognised. It aims to identify and understand how normative commitment manifests within Portuguese-Brazilian journalistic discourse. The normative perspective is examined here, as its traditional association with democracy in the United States does not necessarily apply to all societies. For this analysis, a broader case study was conducted, focusing on the editorial published jointly by Público (Portugal) and Folha de S. Paulo (Brazil) on July 9, 2020. Under the theoretical-methodological framework of discourse studies, critical discourse analysis was applied. The results indicate that Portuguese-Brazilian journalistic discourse spans five key axes: digital information, the idealisation of journalism as an advocate of democracy, migration issues, the Portuguese language, and European objectives. Broadly, Público and Folha de S. Paulo are collaborating to strengthen their position in the journalistic field. However, despite their aspiration for an alliance between Portugal and Brazil, the political and institutional particularities of each country undermine this ideal. The case also highlights strategies adopted by traditionally printed newspapers to reaffirm their journalistic credibility, particularly in the face of digital media and misinformation.
Downloads
References
Aguiar, S. (2016). Territórios do jornalismo: Geografias de mídia local e regional no Brasil. Editora PUC-Rio; Vozes.
Albuquerque, A. de. (2005). Another “Fourth Branch”: Press and political culture in Brazil. Journalism, 6(4), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056817
Albuquerque, A. de. (2019a). Journalism and multiple modernities: The Folha de S. Paulo reform in Brazil. Journalism Studies, 20(11), 1546–1562. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1528881
Albuquerque, A. de. (2019b). Protecting democracy or conspiring against it? Media and politics in Latin America: A glimpse from Brazil. Journalism, 20(7), 906–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917738376
Assis, G. D. O. (2021). “Estar aqui, estar lá”: Novas configurações familiares e afetivas na migração de brasileiros para Europa. Simpósio Gênero e Políticas Públicas, 6, 1212–1229. https://doi.org/10.5433/SGPP.2020v6.p1212
Avritzer, L. (2020). A crise da democracia e a ascensão do populismo de direita no Brasil. In A. C. Pinto & F. Gentile (Eds.), Populismo - Teorias e casos (1.a ed., pp. 145–156). Edmeta.
Azevedo, F. A. (2006). Mídia e democracia no Brasil: Relações entre o sistema de mídia e o sistema político. Opinião Pública, 12(1), 88–113. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-62762006000100004
Barretto Filho, H. T. (2020). Bolsonaro, meio ambiente, povos e terras indígenas e de comunidades tradicionais. Cadernos de Campo (São Paulo - 1991), 29(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9133.v29i2pe178663
Belair-Gagnon, V. (2019). Sociology of news work. In T. P. Vos & F. Hanusch (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of journalism studies (pp. 1–8). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0031
Borges, R., & Afonso, A. (2018). Why subaltern language? Yes, we speak Portuguese! Para uma crítica da colonialidade da língua na mobilidade estudantil internacional. Comunicação e Sociedade, 34, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.34(2018).2935
Bourdieu, P. (2005). The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field. In R. Benson & E. Neveu (Eds.), Bourdieu and the journalistic field (pp. 29–47). Polity Press.
Brüggemann, M., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Humprecht, E., & Castro, L. (2014). Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of Western media systems. Journal of Communication, 64(6), 1037–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12127
Carey, J. W. (2007). A short history of journalism for journalists: A proposal and essay. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X06297603
Carlson, M. (2016). Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. Communication Theory, 26(4), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12088
Carlson, M., Robinson, S., Lewis, S. C., & Berkowitz, D. A. (2018). Journalism studies and its core commitments: The making of a communication field. Journal of Communication, 68(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx006
Carvalho, C. A. (2019). Moisés de Lemos Martins: “O português é uma língua não só de comunicação, mas também de culturas, pensamento e conhecimento”. MATRIZes, 13(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v13i1p93-106
Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R. A. (2009). Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. University of Illinois Press.
Couldry, N., & Andreas, H. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.
Deuze, M. (2001). Understanding the impact of the internet: On new media professionalism, mindsets and buzzwords. EJournalist, 1(1).
Deuze, M. (2003). The web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of newsmedia online. New Media & Society, 5(2), 203–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005002004
Deuze, M., & Witschge, T. (2018). Beyond journalism: Theorizing the transformation of journalism. Journalism, 19(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916688550
Dias, A. B. (2012). O presente da memória: Uso do passado e as (re)construções de identidade da Folha de São Paulo, entre o “golpe de 1964” e a “ditabranda” [Dissertação de mestrado, Universidade Federal do Paraná]. DSpace. http://hdl.handle.net/1884/27381
Eldridge, S., II. (2017). Hero or anti-hero? Digital Journalism, 5(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1162105
França, T., & Padilla, B. (2019). Imigração brasileira para Portugal: Entre o surgimento e a construção midiática de uma nova vaga. Cadernos de Estudos Sociais, 33(2), 207–237. https://doi.org/10.33148/CES2595-4091v.33n.220181773
França, V. R. V. (1998). Jornalismo e a vida social: A história amena de um jornal mineiro. Editora UFMG.
Franklin, B. (2012). The future of journalism: Developments and debates. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.712301
Freedman, E. (2020). In the crosshairs: The perils of environmental journalism. Journal of Human Rights, 19(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2020.1746180
Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001182
Guimarães, G. T. D., Paula, M. C., & Hirai, W. G. (2020). Discourse analysis applied to qualitative research: Methodological perspective in debate. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 4, 40–54. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.40-54
Guion, L. A., Diehl, D. C., & McDonald, D. (2011). Conducting an in-depth interview. University of Florida.
Hallin, D. C., & Giles, R. (2005). Presses and democracies. In G. Overholser & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), Institutions of American democracy: The press (pp. 4–16). Oxford University Press.
Hanitzsch, T. (2019). Journalistic roles. In T. P. Vos & F. Hanusch (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of journalism studies (pp. 1–9). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0029
Josephi, B. (2013). De-coupling journalism and democracy: Or how much democracy does journalism need? Journalism, 14(4), 441–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913489000
Martins, M. de L. (2010). Jornalismo e sonho de comunidade. In M. Oliveira (Ed.), Metajornalismo - Quando o jornalismo é sujeito do próprio discurso (pp. 9–13). Grácio Editor. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/30049
Martins, M. de L. (2017). A linguagem, a verdade e o poder: Ensaio de semiótica social. Edições Húmus.
McNair, B. (1998). The sociology of journalism. Arnold.
McNair, B. (2017). After objectivity? Schudson’s sociology of journalism in the era of post-factuality. Journalism Studies, 18(10), 1318–1333. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1347893
McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory. SAGE.
Mesquita, L. (2023). Collaborative journalism and normative journalism: Lessons from Latin American journalism. Anàlisi, 68, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3541
Miranda, J., Fidalgo, J., & Martins, P. (2021). Jornalistas em tempo de pandemia: Novas rotinas profissionais, novos desafios éticos. Comunicação e Sociedade, 39, 287–307. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.39(2021).3176
Moon, R. (2021). When journalists see themselves as villains: The power of negative discourse. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(3), 790–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020985465
Nerone, J. (2013). The historical roots of the normative model of journalism. Journalism, 14(4), 446–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912464177
Nicoletti, J., & Flores, A. M. M. (2022). Violência contra jornalistas no canal de Jair Bolsonaro no Youtube. Brazilian Journalism Research, 18(1), 4–35. https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v18n1.2022.1438
Ninitas, M. S. (2020). “Troca de galhardetes”. Para o estudo da violência verbal na polémica sobre o acordo ortográfico em Portugal. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 28(4), 1873–1912 . https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.28.4.1873-1912
Novais, R. A., Moreira, S. V., & Silva, L. (2013). Brothers in arms? Portuguese and Brazilian journalistic worlds compared. Brazilian Journalism Research, 9(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v9n1.2013.486
Oliveira, M., & Paulino, F. O. (2017). Serviço público de média em Portugal e no Brasil: Problemas e desafios da pesquisa comparada. Sur le Journalisme, About Journalism, Sobre Jornalismo, 6(2), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.25200/SLJ.v6.n2.2017.317
O’Sullivan, J., Fortunati, L., Taipale, S., & Barnhurst, K. (2017). Innovators and innovated: Newspapers and the postdigital future beyond the “death of print”. Information Society, 33(2), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1289488
Paixão Marcos, P. S. M. (2018). Linha editorial no jornalismo brasileiro: Conceito, gênese e contradições entre a teoria e a prática. Revista Alterjor, 17(1), 90–108.
Perdomo, G., & Rodrigues-Rouleau, P. (2022). Transparency as metajournalistic performance: The New York Times’ Caliphate podcast and new ways to claim journalistic authority. Journalism, 23(11), 2311–2327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884921997312
Perreault, G., Perreault, M. F., & Maares, P. (2022). Metajournalistic discourse as a stabilizer within the journalistic field: Journalistic practice in the Covid-19 pandemic. Journalism Practice, 16(2–3), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1949630
Perreault, G., Tandoc, E., & Caberlon, L. (2023). Journalism after life: Obituaries as metajournalistic discourse. Journalism Practice, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2202642
Quandt, T., Frischlich, L., Boberg, S., & Schatto-Eckrodt, T. (2019). Fake news. In The international encyclopedia of journalism studies (pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0128
Rezola, M. I. (2008). The military, 25 April and the Portuguese transition to democracy. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 7(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss.7.1.3_1
Sakurai, T. (2017). Cultural factors in the flow of international news: A review of the literature. SHS Web of Conferences, 33, Artigo 00008. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173300008
Scalabrin Müller, M., Cabecinhas, R., & Santos Silva, D. (2023). Cultural journalism in Brazil and Portugal. Brazilian Journalism Research, 19(1), e1546. https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v19n1.2023.1546
Schudson, M. (2011). The sociology of the news. W. W. Norton and Company.
Serrano, E. (2020). Populismo em Portugal. Media & Jornalismo, 20(37), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-5462_37_12
Souza, S. M. B. de. (2019). Jornalismo e mobilidade: Características do app do jornal Folha de S. Paulo [Monografia de graduação, Universidade Federal do Tocantins]. Repositório UFT. http://hdl.handle.net/11612/1905
Thomas, R. J. (2019). Helpfulness as journalism’s normative anchor: Addressing blind spots and going back to basics. Journalism Studies, 20(3), 364–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1377103
Traquina, N. (2005). Teorias do jornalismo: Porque as notícias são como são. Insular.
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. SAGE.
van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2.a ed., pp. 466–485). Wiley Blackwell.
van Dijk, T. A. (2017). Discurso, notícia e ideologia: Estudos na análise crítica do discurso. Edições Húmus.
Vargas, C., Sarmento, C., & Oliveira, P. (2017). Cultural networks between Portugal and Brazil: A postcolonial review. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23(3), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2015.1056175
Wu, H. (2000). Systemic determinants of international news coverage: A comparison of 38 countries. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02844.x
Wu, L., Morstatter, F., Carley, K. M., & Liu, H. (2019). Misinformation in social media. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 21(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373464.3373475
Zelizer, B. (2017). What journalism could be. Polity Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Thaís Braga

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright, providing the journal with the right of first publication. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.