Portuguese Party Leaders on Twitter: Interactions and Media Hybridisation Strategies

Authors

  • Vítor Gonçalves Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia, Escola de Sociologia e Políticas Públicas, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0342-4357

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.44(2023).4828

Keywords:

political actors, Twitter, Twitter interaction, hybrid media system

Abstract

This study aims to understand to what extent Portuguese political party leaders use the interactions accessible on Twitter, namely the retweets, mentions of other users and hyperlinks, and to observe which connection networks are created — whether within the party or outside of it, such as citizens or political actors from other parties. Additionally, we verify how political actors use Twitter to implement a strategy in the hybrid media system model, establishing links to “traditional media” such as newspapers, radio, and television. The data comprises tweets published by four Portuguese party leaders, from Partido Socialista, Partido Social Democrata, Bloco de Esquerda and Chega, during 2021 and 2022, subsequently subject to content analysis using the MAXQDA program. The research revealed that all leaders use Twitter’s interaction possibilities but with different intensities. We verified that they all employ a hybrid communication strategy by converging traditional media content in the Twitter platform. We establish a typology of communication strategies party leaders implement on Twitter from the obtained data. We also identify and characterise the possibilities that media interactions conducted by party leaders can assume in the Twitter arena.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vítor Gonçalves, Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia, Escola de Sociologia e Políticas Públicas, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

Vítor Gonçalves is a PhD candidate in communication sciences (Instituto Universitário de Lisboa). He holds a master’s degree in political science (Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas, 2002–2004) and has a degree in social communication (1988–1992). He completed a journalism course at the Boston University College of Communication (United States of America) in 1998 and a television journalism course at the RTP Training Centre in 1992. He is a journalist at RTP, host of the Grande Entrevista (Great Interview), and deputy director of information in 2011–2012 and 2015–2018. He was Washington correspondent (2007–2011) and national politics editor (2000–2007). He has lectured at the Instituto Superior de Comunicação Empresarial (2011–2018) and the Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas (1997–2007 and 2012 to date). He is also the author of several publications.

References

Artwick, C. G. (2013). Reporters on Twitter: Product or service? Digital Journalism, 1(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.744555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.744555

Baumman, A., Fabian, B., Lessmann, S., & Holzberg, L. (2016, 12–15 de junho). Twitter and the political landscape – A graph analysis of German politicians. 24th European Conference on Information Systems, Istambul, Turquia.

Baviera, T., Calvo, D., & Llorca-Abad, G. (2019). Mediatization in Twitter: An exploratory analysis of the 2015 Spanish general election. The Journal of International Communication, 25(2), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2019.1634619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2019.1634619

Blumler, J. G. (2013, 12 de setembro). The fourth age of political communication [Discurso de abertura]. Workshop on Political Communication Online, Berlim, Alemanha.

Boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. In R. H. Sprague, Jr. (Ed.), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.412

Bruns, A. (2005). Gatewatching: Collaborative online news production. Peter Lang.

Bruns, A. (2012). How long is a tweet? Mapping dynamic conversation networks on Twitter using Gawk and Gephi. Information, Communication & Society, 15(9), 1323–1351. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.635214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.635214

Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2012). Researching news discussion on Twitter: New methodologies. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664428 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664428

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

Burton, M. J., Miller, W. J., & Shea, D. M. (2015). Campaign craft: The strategies, tactics, and art of political campaign. Praeger.

Calvo, D., & Campos-Domínguez, E. (2016). Participation and topics of discussion of Spaniards in the digital public sphere. Communication & Society, 29(4), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.29.4.219-234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.29.4.219-234

Cammaerts, B. (2012). Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. European Journal of Communication, 27(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112441007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112441007

Cardoso, G. (2009). Da comunicação de massa para a comunicação em rede. In R. Cádima, G. Cardoso, & L. L. Cardoso (Eds.), Média, redes e comunicação (pp. 12–48). Quimera.

Cardoso, G. (2023). A comunicação da comunicação. As pessoas são a mensagem. Mundos Sociais.

Casero-Ripollés, A., Feenstra, R. A., & Tormey, S. (2016). Old and new media logics in an electoral campaign: The case of Podemos and the two-way street mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 378–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645340

Castells, M. (2011). Communication power. Oxford University Press.

Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001

Christensen, C. (2013). Wave-riding and hashtag-jumping: Twitter, minority ‘third parties’ and the 2012 US elections. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 646–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.783609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.783609

Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818271

Conceição, R. (2021, 13 de dezembro). Marcelo censura Rui Rio pelo “azar de Rendeiro”. O ex-banqueiro já está no tribunal. Observador. https://observador.pt/newsletters/360/marcelo-censura-rui-rio-pelo-azar-de-rendeiro-o-ex-banqueiro-ja-esta-no-tribunal/

Dinis, D. (2021, 14 de dezembro). Rio insiste: Quem deteve Rendeiro “foi a polícia sul-africana”. E o diretor da PJ “fez um foguetório para beneficiar o PS”. Expresso. https://expresso.pt/politica/2021-12-14-Rio-insiste-quem-deteve-Rendeiro-foi-a-policia-sul-africana.-E-o-diretor-da-PJ-fez-um-foguetorio-para-beneficiar-o-PS-66f991e0

Enjolras, B. (2014, 8–9 de janeiro). How politicians use Twitter, and does it matter? The case of Norwegian national politicians [Apresentação de comunicação]. International Conference Democracy as Idea and Practice, Oslo, Noruega.

Gainous, J., & Wagner K. M. (2014). Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199965076.001.0001

García-Ortega, C., & Zugasti-Azagra, R. (2018). Gestión de la campaña de las elecciones generales de 2016 en las cuentas de Twitter de los candidatos: Entre la autorreferencialidad y la hibridación mediática. El Profesional de la Información, 27(6), 1215–1224. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.05

Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., & Van ‘t Haar, G. (2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 692–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581

Hansen, L. K., Arvidsson, A., Nielsen, F., Colleoni, E., & Etter, M. (2011). Good friends, bad news-affect and virality in Twitter. In J. H. Park, L. Yang, & C. Lee (Eds.), Future information technology (pp. 34–43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1101.0510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22309-9_5

Jurgen, P., & Jungherr, A. (2015). The use of Twitter during the 2009 German national election. German Politics, 24(4), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2015.1116522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2015.1116522

Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media & Society, 4(3), 355–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144402320564392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/146144480200400303

Kreiss, D. (2014). Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1473–1490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814562445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814562445

Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. M. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 591–600). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772751

Lee, E., & Shin, S. Y. (2012). Are they talking to me? Cognitive and affective effects of interactivity in politicians Twitter mommunication. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 15(10), 515–520. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0228

Lee, N. Y., Kim, Y., & Kim, J. (2016). Tweeting public affairs or personal affairs? Journalists’ tweets, interactivity, and ideology. Journalism, 17(7), 845–864. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915585954 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915585954

Lewis, S., Holton, A., & Coddington, M. (2014). Reciprocal journalism: A concept of mutual exchange between journalists and audiences. Journalism Practice, 8(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.859840 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.859840

López-García, G. (2016). ‘New’ vs ‘old’ leaderships: The campaign of Spanish general elections 2015 on Twitter. Communication & Society, 29(3), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.29.3.149-168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.29.3.149-168

López-Meri, A., Marcos-García, S., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2017). What do politicians do on Twitter? Functions and communication strategies in the Spanish electoral campaign of 2016. El Profissional de la Información, 26(5), 795–804. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.02

López-Rabadán, P., & Mellado, C. (2019). Twitter as a space for interaction in political journalism. Dynamics, consequences and proposal of interactivity scale for social media. Communication & Society, 32(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.1.1-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.37810

Maarek, P. J. (2011). Campaign communication and political marketing. Wiley-Blackwell.

McNair, B. (2017). An introduction to political communication (6.ª ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750293

Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013) Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212474472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212474472

Moinuddin, S. (2019). The political Twittersphere in India. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11602-6

Morris, D. S., & Morris, J. S. (2017). Evolving learning: The changing effect of Internet access on political knowledge and engagement (1998–2012). Sociological Forum, 32(2), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12333

Murthy, D. (2012). Towards a sociological understanding of social media: Theorizing Twitter. Sociology, 46(6), 1059–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511422553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511422553

Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in post-industrial societies. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609343

Parmelee, J. H., & Bichard, S. L. (2012). Politics and the Twitter revolution: How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Lexington Books.

PCP acusa Rio de querer “dar ordens à PJ” sobre “quem pode ou não” ser detido. (2021, 16 de dezembro). SIC Notícias. https://sicnoticias.pt/pais/2021-12-16-PCP-acusa-Rio-de-querer-dar-ordens-a-PJ-sobre-quem-pode-ou-nao-ser-detido-8240c859

Pfetsch, B., & Esser, F. (2012). Comparing political communication. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 25–47). Routledge.

Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2(4), Artigo JCMC243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00201.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00201.x

Ramos-Serrano, M., Gómez, J. D. F., & Pineda, A. (2016). ‘Follow the closing of the campaign on streaming’: The use of Twitter by Spanish political parties during the 2014 European elections. New Media & Society, 20(1) 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660730

RTP Play. (2021, 14 de dezembro). Eleições legislativas 2022 - Entrevistas líderes partidários: PSD - Rui Rio|Ep. 7 [Vídeo]. https://www.rtp.pt/play/p9596/e585997/eleicoes-legislativas-2022-entrevistas-lideres-partidarios

Rui Rio sugere que calendário eleitoral influenciou prisão de Rendeiro. (2021, 12 de dezembro). Rádio Renascença. https://rr.sapo.pt/noticia/pais/2021/12/12/rui-rio-sugere-que-calendario-eleitoral-influenciou-prisao-de-rendeiro/264247/

Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2014). Social media and political communication - A social media analytics framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 1277–1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3

Stromer-Galley, J. (2014). Presidential campaigning in the internet age. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199731930.001.0001

Swanson, D. L., & Mancini, P (1996). Politics, media, and modern democracy. Praeger.

Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T., Hubé, N., & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2017). Personalization. In C. de Vreese, F. Esser, & D. N. Hopmann (Eds.), Comparing political journalism (pp. 112–130). Routledge.

Zamora-Medina, R., Sánchez-Cobarro, P. H., & Martínez-Martínez, H. (2017). The importance of the “strategic game” to frame the political discourse in Twitter during 2015 Spanish regional elections. Communication & Society, 30(3), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.30.3.229-253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.30.3.229-253

Published

2023-10-25

How to Cite

Gonçalves, V. (2023). Portuguese Party Leaders on Twitter: Interactions and Media Hybridisation Strategies. Comunicação E Sociedade, 44, e023018. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.44(2023).4828