Quando as Redes Sociais Digitais São Fontes Jornalísticas — Uma Abordagem a Códigos Deontológicos

Paulo Martins

doi:10.17231/comsoc.45(2024).4748

Authors

Paulo Martins Centro de Administração e Políticas Públicas, Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6445-8115

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.45(2024).4748

Keywords:

digital social networks, information gathering, information sources, journalistic ethics and deontology, professional practices

Abstract

The inescapable influence of social media on journalism has introduced a multitude of challenges that professionals in the field cannot afford to overlook. Increasingly used as sources, social media platforms contribute significantly to the evolution of new dynamics in news production. This is particularly evident in the coverage of unfolding events, prioritising speed of transmission and immediacy as inherent values. This emphasis often encourages the rapid extraction of content available on the internet, leaving minimal time for thorough scrutiny. This article delves into the phenomenon from an ethical standpoint. Through an analysis of 32 codes of ethics — and analogous instruments — that specifically address this evolving reality, it identifies journalistic values and principles concerning information-gathering methods, especially pertaining to digital social networks. The primary emphasis remains on the requirement to verify and validate the material while identifying sources following traditional procedures, given the potential risks to the integrity of journalistic narratives. Most codes in the corpus also prioritise safeguarding citizens' private sphere, possibly stemming from the dissemination of material. This concern extends beyond general privacy protection, encompassing the highly sensitive issues associated with it: the vulnerability and emotional distress experienced by authors of social media posts and the presence of victims or minors on social networks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Paulo Martins, Centro de Administração e Políticas Públicas, Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

Paulo Martins is a journalist, assistant professor at the School of Social and Political Sciences of the Universidade de Lisboa and a researcher of the Centre for Public Administration and Public Policies. He has a PhD in Social Sciences, specialising in Communication Sciences, and focuses his research on journalistic ethics and deontology. He has published articles and book chapters — notably in Ética Aplicada. Comunicação Social (Applied Ethics. Media; 2017) — and two books, O Privado em Público – Direito à Informação e Direitos de Personalidade (The Private in Public – Right to Information and Personality Rights; 2013) and O Bairro dos Jornais (The Newspaper Neighbourhood; 2018).

References

Associated Press. (2013). Social media guidelines for AP employees. https://www.ap.org/assets/documents/social-media-guidelines_tcm28-9832.pdf

Ballesteros-Aguayo, L., Ruiz del Olmo, F. J., & Gutiérrez-Lozano, J. F. (2022). Journalistic ethics and persuasive communication in the face of post-truth: Credibility in the face of the challenges of social networks. Observatorio (OBS*), 16(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS16320222159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS16320222159

Bechmann, A., & Lomborg, S. (2013). Mapping actor roles in social media: Different perspectives on value creation in theories of user participation. New Media & Society, 15(5), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462853

Belair-Gagnon, V. (2015). Social media at BBC News: The re-making of crisis reporting. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315742052

Brandtzaeg, P. B., Lüders, M., Spangenberg, J., Rathwiggins, L., & Følstad, A. (2016). Emerging journalistic verification practices concerning social media. Journalism Practice, 10(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1020331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1020331

Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2013). Twitter as a news source. How Dutch and British newspapers used tweets in their news coverage, 2007-2011. Journalism Practice, 7(4), 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.802481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.802481

Castells, M. (1999). A sociedade em rede - Vol. I (8.ª ed., R. N. Majer, Trad.). Paz e Terra. (Trabalho original publicado em 1996)

Castilho, C. (2022, 19 de julho). 13 dilemas para o jornalismo contemporâneo. Observatório da Imprensa. https://www.observatoriodaimprensa.com.br/sem-categoria/13-dilemas-para-o-jornalismo-contemporaneo/

Christofoletti, R. (2019). Percepções de jornalistas brasileiros sobre privacidade. MATRIZes, 13(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v13i2p179-202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v13i2p179-202

Christophg, R., Bernhard, F., Marielouise, L., Dieterm, B., Gudrun, S., &Hans, W. (2012). Social media guidelines. ORF. https://zukunft.orf.at/rte/upload/isabelle/social_media_guidelines.pdf

Colombo, M. E., Varela, U. do N., & Biazotti, V. J. S. (2023). Jornalismo e internet: Evolução e perspectivas dos processos de circulação de notícias. Lumina, 17(2), 108–124. https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/lumina/article/view/39413

Conselho Regulador da Entidade Reguladora para a Comunicação Social. (2014, 29 de outubro). Diretiva 2/2014: Utilização jornalística de conteúdo gerado pelo utilizador. https://www.erc.pt/document.php?id=ZDQyNWU2ZGUtNGJjOS00MDVjLTliY2YtYjFkNmJhZDMyMjk0

Conselho Regulador da Entidade Reguladora para a Comunicação Social. (2022, 19 de outubro). Deliberação ERC/2022/345 (CONTJOR-TV). https://www.erc.pt/document.php?id=ZDA1YjE5NmItMmFhNy00NDRmLWFjNjEtNWM1ZTYyYmIwY2Vl

Elliott, D., & Spence, E. H. (2017). Ethics for a digital era. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118968888

Fidalgo, J., Thomass, B., Ruggiero, C., Bomba, M., Sallusti, S., & von Krogh, T. (2022). Ethical codes of conduct in journalism: Demands for a digitalising mediascape. In J. Trappel & T. Tomaz (Eds.), Success and failure in news media performance: Comparative analysis in the Media for Democracy Monitor 2021 (pp. 211–230). Nordicom. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855589-10

Gottfried, J., Mitchell, A., Jurkowitz, M., & Liedke, J. (2022, 14 de junho). Journalists sense turmoil in their industry amid continued passion for their work. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2022/06/14/journalists-sense-turmoil-in-their-industry-amid-continued-passion-for-their-work/

Grosser, K. M., Hase, V., & Wintterlin, F. (2019). Trustworthy or shady? Exploring the influence of verifying and visualizing UGC on online journalism’s trustworthiness. Journalism Studies, 20(4), 500–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1392255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1392255

Gulyás, A. (2016). Hybridity and social media adoption by journalists: An international comparison. Digital Journalism, 5(7), 884–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1232170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1232170

Hamada, B. I. (2018). Social media: A turning point into global journalism identity and ethics. In J. Višňovský & J. Radošinská (Eds.), Social media and journalism – Trends, connections, implications (pp. 35–56). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.80255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.80255

Hohmann, J., & 2010-11 ASNE Ethics and Values Committee. (2011). 10 Best practices for social media – Helpful guidelines for news organizations. ASNE. https://members.newsleaders.org/Files/pdf/10_Best_Practices_for_Social_Media.pdf

Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/266350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/266350

Hulin, A., & Stone, M. (Eds.). (2013). The online media self-regulation guidebook. OSCE. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/d/b/99560.pdf

Independent Press Standards Organisation. (2022). Guidance on social media. https://www.ipso.co.uk/media/2274/ipso-social-media-guidance.pdf

Jigsaw Research. (2022). News consumption in the UK: 2022. Ofcom. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0027/241947/News-Consumption-in-the-UK-2022-report.pdf

Joffe, M. (2014). An analysis of the media’s coverage of the Columbine High School and Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings [Tese de licenciatura, University of Mississippi].

Konow-Lund, M., & Olsson, E.-K. (2017). Social media’s challenge to journalistic norms and values during a terror attack. Digital Journalism, 5(9), 1192–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1243990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1243990

Lecheler, S., & Kruikemeier, S. (2016). Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: A review of research on the use of online sources. New Media & Society, 18(1), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815600412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815600412

Lecheler, S., Kruikemeier, S., &. de Haan, Y. (2019). The use and verification of online sources in the news production process. In J. E. Katz & K. K. Mays (Eds.), Journalism and truth in an age of social media (pp. 167–181). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190900250.003.0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190900250.003.0012

Lewis, S. C., & Molyneux, L. (2018). A decade of research on social media and journalism: Assumptions, blind spots and a way forward. Media and Communication, 6(4), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1562

Loosen, W. (2011). Online privacy as a news factor in Journalism. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy online (pp. 205–218). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_15

Martins, P. (2019). Redes sociais como fontes de informação jornalística: As novas fronteiras da privacidade. In R. Christofoletti (Ed.), Privacidad, transparencia y éticas renovadas (pp. 11–31). Ediciones Egregius.

Mayo-Cubero, M. (2020). News sections, journalists and information sources in the journalistic coverage of crises and emergencies in Spain. El Profesional de la Información, 29(2), e290211. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.11

McGregor, S. C., & Molyneux, L. (2020). Twitter’s influence on news judgment: An experiment among journalists. Journalism, 21(5), 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918802975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918802975

Moon S. J., & Hadley, P. (2014) Routinizing a new technology in the newsroom: Twitter as a news source in mainstream media. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 58(2), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.906435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.906435

Naab, T. K., & Sehl, A. (2017). Studies of user-generated content: A systematic review. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 18(10), 1256–1273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916673557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916673557

O’Sullivan, J., & Heinonen, A. (2008). Old values, new media: Journalism role perceptions in a changing world. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780802281081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780802281081

Paulussen, S., & Harder, R. A. (2014). Social media references in newspapers – Facebook, Twitter and YouTube as sources in newspaper journalism. Journalism Practice, 8(5), 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.894327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.894327

Primo, A., Lupinacci, L., Valiati, V., & Barros, L. (2015). Comunicação privada na internet: Da invenção do particular na Idade Média à hiperexposição na rede. Intexto, (34), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.19132/1807-8583201534.513-534 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19132/1807-8583201534.513-534

Rauchfleisch, A., Artho, X., Metag, J., Post, S., & Schäfer, M. S. (2017). How journalists verify user-generated content during terrorist crises. Analyzing Twitter communication during the Brussels attacks. Social Media + Society, 3(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117717888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117717888

Shih, G. (2013, 20 de abril). Media, old and new, takes heat for Boston coverage. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/boston-bombing-media-idINDEE93J04E20130420

Silva, G. C. da, Sanseverino, G. G., Santos, M. F. de L., & Mesquita, L. (2020). Como as plataformas digitais provocaram uma ruptura no modelo de jornalismo consolidado no século XX. Revista Eptic, 22(1), 162–178. https://periodicos.ufs.br/eptic/article/view/12124

Smith, P. K., & Sissons, H. (2019). Social media and a case of mistaken identity: A newspaper’s response to journalistic error. Journalism, 20(3), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916683551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916683551

Standards and Practices Committee. (2009, 19 de novembro). Social media guidelines. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/archives/blogs/readers-representative/story/2009-11-19/times-updates-social-media-guidelines

Suárez Villegas, J. C., & Cruz Álvarez, J. (2016). Los dilemas deontológicos del uso de las redes sociales como fuentes de información. Análisis de la opinión de los periodistas de tres países. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 71, 66–84. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2016-1084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2016-1084

Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295

Usher, N. (2018). Breaking news production processes in US metropolitan newspapers: Immediacy and journalistic authority. Journalism, 19(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916689151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916689151

van Dalen, A. (2020). Journalism, trust, and credibility. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (2.ª ed., pp. 356–371). ICA Handbook Series. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167497-23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167497-23

Vinuesa, C. J., & Nicolás-Sans, R. (2023). Periodismo deontológico vs periodismo digital: ¿Las dos caras de la misma moneda? Visual Review, 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v10.4623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v10.4623

von Nordheim, G., Boczek, K., & Koppers, L. (2018). Sourcing the sources: An analysis of the use of Twitter and Facebook as a journalistic source over 10 years in The New York Times, The Guardian, and Suddeutsche Zeitung. Digital Journalism, 6(7), 807–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1490658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1490658

von Pape, T., Trepte, S., & Mothes, C. (2017). Privacy by disaster? Press coverage of privacy and digital technology. European Journal of Communication, 32(3), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323117689994 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323117689994

Ward, S. (2018). Reconstructing journalism ethics: Disrupt, invent, collaborate. Media & Jornalismo, 18(32), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-5462_32_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-5462_32_1

Wardle, C., Dubberley, S., & Brown, P. D. (2014). Amateur footage: A global study of user-generated content in TV and online news output. Columbia Journalism School.

Weaver, D. H., & Willnat, L. (2016). Changes in U. S. journalism. How do journalists think about social media? Journalism Practice, 10(7), 844–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1171162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1171162

Washington Post’s social media policy. (2009). Inside Social Media. https://insidesocialmedia.com/social-media-policies/washington-posts-social-media-policy/

Wheatley, D. (2020). Victims and voices: Journalistic sourcing practices and the use of private citizens in online healthcare-system news. Journalism Studies, 21(8), 1017–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1727355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1727355

Whitehouse, G. (2010). Newsgathering and privacy: Expanding ethics codes to reflect change in the digital media age. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 25(4), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2010.512827 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2010.512827