Colonial Ambivalence in Contemporary Moving Images: The Portuguese Case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.41(2022).3698Keywords:
ambivalence, colonialism, post-colonialism, cinema, PortugalAbstract
This article is an exploratory attempt to address the colonial ambivalence implicit in contemporary moving images in the Portuguese context. The postcolonial turn that emerged in the last decades in Portugal attests to an earnest attempt to problematise the nation’s postcolonial condition, which in turn derives from a long-overdue admission that our contemporary societies were built from colonial plunder. Drawing heavily on the critique of Lusophony, I argue that this postcolonial turn is also a consequence of the need to inscribe the Portuguese national narrative within an increasingly global world arising from the subordination of culture to the “laws of the market”. In addition, I argue that this post-colonial approach found in Portuguese contemporary visual culture is ambivalent since it tends to ignore the problem of the legitimacy and the speaking position of the artist and/or intellectual. The legitimacy problem — of who speaks of and about others — is often paradoxically disregarded in contemporary audiovisual productions that address the Portuguese colonial past and its postcolonial condition. In the same way, the intrinsic relationship between visual production and knowledge is ignored, and consequently, between visual production and power. In this way, I argue that colonial ambivalence continues to pervade cultural discourses and contemporary artistic practices today, even when such practices and discourses appear to articulate a postcolonial critique.
Downloads
References
Almeida, M. V. de. (2004). An earth-colored sea: “Race”, culture and the politics of identity in the post-colonial Portuguese-speaking world. Berghahn.
Azoulay, A. A. (2021). Toward the abolition of photography’s imperial rights. In K. Coleman & D. James (Eds.), Capitalism and the camera (pp. 72–128). Verso.
Bea, E. (2016, November 20). White skin, black masks: On the “Decolonial Desire” of Vasco Araújo. Media Diversified. https://mediadiversified.org/2016/11/20/white-skin-black-masks-on-the-decolonial-desire-of-vasco-araujo/
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
César, F. (Director). (2011). A embaixada [Film]. Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation; Haus der Kulturen der Welt.
Duarte, M. (2021, February 5). Há um Brasil a fazer perguntas difíceis a Portugal. Público. https://www.publico.pt/2021/02/05/culturaipsilon/noticia/ha-brasil-perguntas-dificeis-portugal-1949072
Fanon, F. (2008). Black skin, white masks. Pluto Press.
Ferreira, C. O. (2014). The end of history through the disclosure of fiction: Indisciplinarity in Miguel Gomes’s Tabu (2012). Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image, 5, 18–47. http://cjpmi.ifilnova.pt/5-ndice
Hall, S. (2003). The spectacle of the other. In S. Hall, J. Evans, & S. Nixon (Eds.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 223–278). Sage Publications.
Henda, K. K. (Director). (2017). Havemos de voltar [Film]. Geração 80; Jahmek Contemporary Art.
Jameson, F. (1998). The cultural turn: Selected writings on the postmodern. Verso.
Medeiros, P. de. (2016). Post-imperial nostalgia and Miguel Gomes’ Tabu. Interventions, 18(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2015.1106963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2015.1106963
Medeiros, P. de. (2018). Lusophony or the haunted logic of postempire. Lusotopie, 17(2), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1163/17683084-12341720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/17683084-12341720
Mirzoeff, N. (2011) The right to look, a counterhistory of visuality. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822393726
Mombaça, J. (2017, November 7). A coisa tá branca! Buala. https://www.buala.org/pt/mukanda/a-coisa-ta-branca
Mourão, P. (2018). Sobre algumas ruínas, uns lamentam, outros dançam: Algumas impressões sobre a presença portuguesa na 20ª edição do Videobrasil. Aniki, 5(1), 206–213. https://doi.org/10.14591/aniki.v5n1.369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14591/aniki.v5n1.369
Mourinha, V. (2020, January 22). Mosquito: “Este filme é uma forma de me redimir por ser filho de colonizadores”. Público. https://www.publico.pt/2020/01/22/culturaipsilon/noticia/-filme-forma-redimir-filho-colonizadores-1901077
Oliveira, A. de B. (2016). Descolonização em, de e através das imagens de arquivo “em movimento” da prática artística. Comunicação e Sociedade, 29, 107–129. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.29(2016).2412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.29(2016).2412
Oliveira, A. de B. (2017). Avó e O Jogo, ou o arquivo colonial “em movimento” nos vídeos de Raquel Schefer. Revista África(s), 4(7), 21–29. https://revistas.uneb.br/index.php/africas/article/view/4178
Pereira, A. C. (2016). Otherness and identity in Tabu from Miguel Gomes. Comunicação e Sociedade, 29, 331–350. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.29(2016).2423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.29(2016).2423
Pereira, A. C. (2021). Margarida Cardoso e as mulheres da casa-grande: Reconfigurar a memória (pós)colonial a partir da branquitude. Revista Ciências Humanas, 14(3), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.32813/2179-1120.2121.v14.n2.a751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32813/2179-1120.2121.v14.n2.a751
Piçarra, M. do C. (2006). Salazar vai ao cinema I. Minerva.
Piçarra, M. do C. (2011). Salazar vai ao cinema II. DrellaDesign.
Piçarra, M. do C. (2015). Azuis ultramarinos. Propaganda colonial e censura no cinema do Estado Novo. Edições 70.
Piçarra, M. do C., & Castro, T. (2017). (Re)Imagining African independence: Film, visual arts and the fall of the Portuguese empire. Peter Lang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/b10787
Portugal reaches deal on EU and IMF bail-out. (2011, May 4). BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-13275470
Ribeiro, A. P. (2018). Para acabar de vez com a lusofonia. Lusotopie, 17(2), 220–226. https://journals.openedition.org/lusotopie/3033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/17683084-12341728
Sales, M. (2021). Nossos fantasmas estão vindo cobrar: Giro decolonial na arte contemporânea brasileira. Vista, (8), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21814/vista.3641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21814/vista.3641
Sales, M., & Lança, M. (2019). A matriz colonial de poder e o campo da arte: E nós? Como existir? Como re-existir? Vazantes, 3(1), 17–39. http://periodicos.ufc.br/vazantes/article/view/42912
Santos, B. de S. (2002). Between Prospero and Caliban: Colonialism, postcolonialism, and inter-identity. Luso-Brazilian Review, 39(2), 9–43. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/41193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lbr.39.2.9
Saraiva, J. C. (2018, May 5). O polémico museu-fantasma dos descobrimentos. Jornal i. https://ionline.sapo.pt/artigo/610802/o-polemico-museu-fantasma-dos-descobrimentos?seccao=Mais_i
Sequeira Brás, P. (2017). Crisis and catastrophe in cinema and video art. Paletten Art Journal, 307/308, 91–95.
Sequeira Brás, P. (2020). Post-Fordism in Active Life (2013), Industrial Revolution (2014) and The Nothing Factory (2017). In T. Austin & A. Koutsourakis (Eds.), Cinema of crisis: Film and contemporary Europe (pp. 76–92). Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474448505.003.0005
Shohat, E. (1991). Imaging terra incognita: The disciplinary gaze of empire. Public Culture, 3(2), 41–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-3-2-41
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University Illinois Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_20
Stam, R. (2000). Film theory: An introduction. Blackwell Publishers.
Tiny, S. (Director). (2021). Constelações equatoriais [Film]. Divina Comédia.
Vicente, F. L. (2014). O império da visão. A fotografia no contexto colonial português (1860-1960). Edições 70.
Vieira, P. (2015). Imperial remains: Postcolonialism in Portuguese literature and cinema. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 14(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss.14.3.275_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss.14.3.275_1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Patrícia Sequeira Brás
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright, providing the journal with the right of first publication. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.