The Invisible Implications of Techno-Optimism of Electronic Monitoring in Portugal

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.40(2021).3503

Keywords:

techno-optimism, electronic surveillance, penal sphere, family, domestic violence

Abstract

In recent years, offenders’ supervision has emerged as a new facet of the penal landscape in most Western countries, growing in scale, reach and scope. In Portugal, in addition to community sanctions and prison sentences, electronic monitoring stands out as a way of monitoring offenders. This penal instrument is associated with high expectations created by political discourses and media messages that portray electronic monitoring as an instrument that enables the reduction of overcrowding and pressure of the prison system and its costs. In addition, it is also argued that, by maintaining offenders in the community, electronic monitoring also favours the maintenance of social ties, avoids the potential criminogenic effects of prison, and facilitates resocialisation processes. In this article, drawing inspiration from social studies of science and technology and surveillance studies, I explore the invisible implications of techno-optimism of electronic monitoring in Portugal. Through documentary analysis, based on parliamentary hearings, media pieces, opinion articles, official reports, and scientific literature, I reflect upon how techno-optimism makes the expansion of the penal sphere invisible. Moreover, techno-optimism about electronic monitoring in Portugal also implies the co-optation of family in the criminal sphere and the transmutation of the domestic space into a confinement space. Regarding domestic violence, techo-optimism around electronic monitoring also contributes to the characterisation of this social phenomenon as having a technoscientific solution, thus narrowing the public debate on its prevention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rafaela Granja, Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade, Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal

Rafaela Granja holds a PhD in sociology (2015) from the Institute of Social Sciences, University of Minho and is a researcher at the Communication and Society Research Centre of the same University. Her research explores technological surveillance of criminalised populations, the interconnections between family, genetics and crime, and reconfigurations of family relationships inside and outside the prison. She is currently developing the research project The Reconfiguration of Genetic Surveillance through DNA Technologies. Her most recent publications include the books Genetic Surveillance and Crime Control: Social, Cultural and Political Perspectives (Routledge, 2021), Forensic Genetics in the Governance of Crime (Palgrave, 2020) and Modes of Bio-Bordering: The Hidden (Dis)integration of Europe (Palgrave, 2020) and Para Cá e Para Lá dos Muros. Negociar Relações Familiares Durante a Reclusão (Here and Beyond the Walls. Negotiating Family Relationships During Reclusion; Afrontamento, 2017).

References

Amelung, N., Granja, R., & Machado, H. (2020). Modes of bio-bordering: The hidden (dis)integration of Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.

Assembleia da República. (2013, 28 de novembro). Audição parlamentar Nº 21-SCI-XII. https://www.parlamento.pt/ActividadeParlamentar/Paginas/DetalheAudicao.aspx?BID=96400

Assembleia da República. (2020, 14 de julho). Diretor-geral de reinserção e serviços prisionais na subcomissão para a reinserção social e assuntos prisionais. https://www.parlamento.pt/Paginas/2020/julho/Diretor-Geral-Reinsercao-Servicos-Prisionais-na-Subcomissao-Reinsercao-Social-Assuntos-Prisionais.aspx

Aungles, A., & Cook, D. (1994). Information technology and the family: Electronic surveillance and home imprisonment. Information Technology & People, 7(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593849410074034

Autoridades deixam alerta a vítimas de violência doméstica. (2017, 2 de novembro). TVI24. https://tvi24.iol.pt/sociedade/pulseira-eletronica/autoridades-alertam-vitimas-de-violencia-domestica-devem-usar-sempre-dispositivo-de-vigilancia

Baiona, C., & Jongelen, I. (2010). “Prisão sem grades”: Factores para o sucesso da medida. Ousar Integrar: Revista de Reinserção Social e Prova, 6, 61–72.

Baumer, E. P., O’Donnell, I., & Hughes, N. (2009). The porous prison: A note on the rehabilitative potential of visits home. The Prison Journal, 89(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885508330430

Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code. Polity Press.

Berg, M. T., & Huebner, B. M. (2011). Reentry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(2), 382–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2010.498383

Beyens, K. (2017). Electronic monitoring and supervision: A comparative perspective. European Journal of Probation, 9(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2066220317704130.

Bosworth, M. (2007). Creating the responsible prisoner: Federal admission and orientation packs. Punishment & Society, 9(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474507070553

Caiado, N. (2014). Pre-trial electronic monitoring in Portugal. Criminal Justice Matters, 95(1), 10–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09627251.2014.902197

Casimiro, C. (2002). Representações sociais de violência conjugal. Análise Social, XXXVII(163), 603–630. http://analisesocial.ics.ul.pt/documentos/1218733193N7lLR3rn1Yd68RN0.pdf

Codd, H. (2007). Prisoners’ families and resettlement: A critical analysis. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(3), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00472.x.

Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control: Crime, punishment and classification. Polity Press.

Cunha, M. I. (2008). Disciplina, controlo, segurança: No rasto contemporâneo de Foucault. In C. Fróis. (Ed.), A sociedade vigilante: Ensaios sobre vigilância, privacidade e anonimato (pp. 67–81). Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.

Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2016). A nova razão do mundo: Ensaios sobre a sociedade neoliberal. Boitempo.

Dias, I. (2010). Violência doméstica e justiça: Respostas e desafios. Sociologia: Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, XX, 245–262.

Direção-Geral da Política de Justiça. (s.d.). Reinserção social. Estatísticas da Justiça. Retirado a 9 de novembro, 2021, de https://estatisticas.justica.gov.pt/sites/siej/pt-pt/Paginas/ReinsercaoSocial.aspx

Direção-Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais. (s.d.-a). Um instrumento para controlo dos agressores de violência doméstica e um contributo para melhor proteção das vítimas. Ministério da Justiça, República Portuguesa. https://dgrsp.justica.gov.pt/Portals/16/Justica%20Adultos/Vigil%C3%A2ncia%20eletr%C3%B3nica/Informacao%20Espec%C3%ADfica/VE_VD%20%20FOLHETO%202018.pdf?ver=2018-11-26-165429-673

Direção-Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais. (s.d.-b). Relatório de atividades e autoavaliação atividades 2018. Ministério da Justiça. https://dgrsp.justica.gov.pt/Portals/16/Instrumentos%20de%20Planeamento%20e%20Gest%C3%A3o/Relat%C3%B3rio%20de%20atividades/2018/RA_2018.pdf?ver=2019-07-11-154949-080

Direção-Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais. (s.d.-c). Relatório de atividades e autoavaliação atividades 2019. Ministério da Justiça. https://dgrsp.justica.gov.pt/Portals/16/Instrumentos%20de%20Planeamento%20e%20Gest%C3%A3o/Relat%C3%B3rio%20de%20atividades/2019/RA-2019.pdf?ver=2020-09-22-170956-227

Direção-Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais. (s.d.-d). Vantagens. Retirado a 15 de junho, 2021, de https://dgrsp.justica.gov.pt/Justi%C3%A7a-de-adultos/Vigil%C3%A2ncia-eletr%C3%B3nica/Vantagens

Direção-Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais. (s.d.-e). Vigilância eletrónica. Retirado a 15 de junho, 2021, de https://dgrsp.justica.gov.pt/Estat%C3%ADsticas-e-indicadores/Vigil%C3%A2ncia-Eletr%C3%B3nica

Direção-Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais. (s.d.-f). Vigilância Eletrónica. Breve enquadramento histórico. Retirado a 15 de junho, 2021, de https://dgrsp.justica.gov.pt/Justi%C3%A7a-de-adultos/Vigil%C3%A2ncia-eletr%C3%B3nica/Breve-enquadramento-hist%C3%B3rico

Direção-Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais. (2020, 22 de julho). Reinserção social e vigilância eletrónica com novas instalações. Justiça.gov.pt. https://justica.gov.pt/Noticias/Reinsercao-Social-e-Vigilancia-Eletronica-com-novas-instalacoes

Direção-Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais. (2021, 5 de março). Número de casos em vigilância eletrónica cresce face a 2020. Justiça.gov.pt. https://justica.gov.pt/Noticias/Numero-de-casos-em-vigilancia-eletronica-cresce-face-a-2020

Dünkel, F., Thiele, C., & Treig, J. (2017). “You’ll never stand-alone”: Electronic monitoring in Germany. European Journal of Probation, 9(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/2066220317697657

Duwe, G., & Clark, V. (2011). Blessed be the social tie that binds: The effects of prison visitation on offender recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403411429724

Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.

Frois, C. (2013). Peripheral vision: Politics, technology, and surveillance. Berghahn Books.

Frois, C. (2015). Dos estudos de vigilância, videovigilância e tecnologia. Reflexão sobre o estado da arte. In M. I. Cunha (Eds.), Do crime e do castigo: Temas e debates contemporâneos (pp. 147–157). Mundos Sociais.

Frois, C. (2020). Prisões. Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos.

Frois, C., & Machado, H. (2016). Modernization and development as a motor of polity and policing. In B. Bradford, B. Jauregui, I. Loader, & J. Steinberg. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of global policing (pp. 391–405). Sage Publications.

Fuchs, C. (2011). Como podemos definir vigilância? Matrizes, 5(1), 109–136. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v5i1p109-136

Granja, R. (2018). Sharing imprisonment: Experiences of prisoners and family members in Portugal. In R. Condry & P. S. Smith (Eds.), Prisons, punishment, and the family: Towards a new sociology of punishment? (pp. 258–272). Oxford University Press.

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

Henriques, A. (2018, 23 de novembro). Foi para a cadeia por não ter electricidade para pulseira. Público. https://www.publico.pt/2018/11/23/sociedade/noticia/feirante-carta-cadeia-falta-electricidade-casa-1852100

Hucklesby, A., Beyens, K., & Boone, M. (2021). Comparing electronic monitoring regimes: Length, breadth, depth and weight equals tightness. Punishment and Society, 23(1), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520915753

Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge. The co-production of science and social order. Routledge.

Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4

Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2015). Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. University of California Press.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2000). When things strike back: A possible contribution of “science studies” to the social sciences. The British Journal of Sociology, 1(51), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00107.x

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press.

Laurie, E., & Maglione, G. (2020). The electronic monitoring of offenders in context: From policy to political logics. Critical Criminology, 28(4), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09471-7

Law, J. (2008). On sociology and STS. Sociological Review, 56(4), 62–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.00808.x

Lei n.º 33/2010, Diário da República n.º 171/2010, Série I de 2010-09-02, 3851 – 3856 (2010). https://dre.pt/dre/detalhe/lei/33-2010-344262

Lei n.º 94/2017, Diário da República n.º 162/2017, Série I de 2017-08-23, 4915 – 4921 (2017). https://dre.pt/dre/detalhe/lei/94-2017-108038373

Lopes, N., & Oliveira, C. S. (2016). Vigiando a violência: O uso de meios de controlo e fiscalização à distância em processos de violência doméstica. Gênero & Direito, 5(1), 68–91. https://doi.org/10.18351/2179-7137/ged.v5n1p68-91

Lusa. (2017, 2 de novembro). Vítimas de violência doméstica devem usar sempre dispositivo de alerta – autoridades. Diário de Notícias. https://www.dn.pt/lusa/vitimas-de-violencia-domestica-devem-usar-sempre-dispositivo-de-alerta---autoridades-8890092.html

Lynch, M. (2012). Science and technology studies: Critical concepts in the social sciences. Routledge.

Lyon, D. (2002). Surveillance as social sorting. Taylor & Francis.

Lyon, D. (2003). Surveillance after September 11. Polity Press.

Lyon, D. (2018). Cultura da vigilância: Envolvimento, exposição e ética na modernidade digital. In B. Cardoso & L. Melgaço (Eds.), Tecnopolíticas da vigilância: Perspectivas da margem (pp. 151–179). Boitempo.

Machado, H., & Frois, C. (2014). Aspiring to modernization: Historical evolution and current trends of state surveillance in Portugal. In K. Boersmaet, R. v. Brakel, C. Fonio, & P. Wagenaar (Eds.), Histories of state surveillance in Europe and beyond (pp. 65–78). Routledge.

Mallart, F. (2019). O arquipélago. Tempo Social, 31(3), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2019.161327

Mallart, F., & Cunha, M. I. (2019). Introdução: As dobras entre o dentro e o fora. Tempo Social, 31(3), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2019.162973.

Martins, N. M. F. (2019). Ciberjustiça – A ética na vigilância eletrónica em Portugal. ReseachGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348362918_Ciberjustica_-_A_Etica_na_Vigilancia_Eletronica_em_Portugal

Marx, G. T. (2002). What’s new about the “new surveillance”? Classifying for change and continuity. Surveillance & Society, 1(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i1.3391

Matthews, R. (2013). Rethinking penal policy: Towards a systems approach. In R. Mattehws & J. Young (Eds.), The new politics of crime and punishment (pp. 223–249). Willan.

McNeill, F., & Beyens, K. (2013). Introduction: Studying mass supervision. In F. McNeill & K. Beyens (Eds.), Offender supervision in Europe (pp. 1–18). Palgrave Macmillan.

Mills, A., & Codd, H. (2008). Prisoners’ families and offender management: Mobilizing social capital. Probation Journal, 55(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550507085675.

Mirowski, P. (2019). Hell is truth seen too late. Boundary 2, 46(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-7271327

Morais, R. (2014). Os dispositivos disciplinares e a norma disciplinar em Foucault. Ítaca, 27, 185–217. https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/Itaca/article/view/2439

Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. PublicAffairs.

Naser, R. L., & Vigne, N. G. La (2006). Family support in the prisoner reentry process: Expectations and realities. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v43n01_05

Nellis, M., Beyens, K., & Kaminski, A. D. (Eds.). (2013). Electronically monitored punishment: International and critical perspectives. Routledge.

Pimentel, I. (2007). A história da PIDE. Círculo de Leitores.

PORDATA. (2021, 9 de novembro). Ocupação efectiva das prisões (%). https://www.pordata.pt/Portugal/Ocupa%c3%a7%c3%a3o+efectiva+das+pris%c3%b5es+(percentagem)-635

Quinlan, A. (2020). The rape kit’s promise: Techno-optimism in the fight against the backlog. Science as Culture, 30(3), 440–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2020.1846696

Ribeiro, M. (1995). A polícia política no Estado Novo, 1926-1974. Editorial Estampa.

Staples, W. G. (2005). The everyday world of house arrest: collateral consequencs for families and others. In C. Mele & T. A. Miller (Eds.), Civil penalities, social consequences (pp. 139–159). Routledge.

Staples, W. G. (2014). Everyday surveillance: Vigilance and visibility in postmodern life. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives: A study in a maximum security prison. Princeton University Press.

Touraut, C. (2009). Entre détenu figé et proches en mouvement. “L’expérience carcérale élargie”: Une épreuve de mobilité. Recherches familiales, 1(6), 81–88. https://www.cairn.info/journal-recherches-familiales-2009-1-page-81.htm

Touraut, C. (2012). La famille à l’épreuve de la prison. Presses Universitaires de France.

Trigueirão, S. (2019, 19 de outubro). Pulseiras electrónicas pouparam ao estado mais de 13,8 milhões de euros em três anos. Público. https://www.publico.pt/2019/10/19/sociedade/noticia/pulseiras-electronicas-pouparam-estado-138-milhoes-euros-tres-anos-1889463

Van Dunem, F. (2018, 21 de novembro). O regime de permanência na habitação e a política criminal do XXI Governo Constitucional. Público. https://www.publico.pt/2018/11/21/sociedade/opiniao/regime-permanencia-habitacao-politica-criminal-xxi-governo-constitucional-1851791

Visher, C. A., & Travis, J. (2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.095931

Wacquant, L. (2000). As prisões da miséria. Celta Editora.

World Prison Brief, Institute for Crime & Justice Policy Research. (s.d.). Highest to lowest - Prison population rate. World Prison Brief. Retirado a 28 de junho, 2021, de https://www.prisonstudies.org/highest-to-lowest/prison_population_rate?field_region_taxonomy_tid=14

Published

2021-12-20

How to Cite

Granja, R. (2021). The Invisible Implications of Techno-Optimism of Electronic Monitoring in Portugal. Comunicação E Sociedade, 40, 247–267. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.40(2021).3503