Participation as a talisman: a metaphorical-theoretical reflection about the conceptualization of participation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.36(2019).2352

Keywords:

fantasy, media studies, metaphorical concept, participation, power

Abstract

Even if participation has been a key word in many research areas within Communication and Media Studies, there are still theoretical disagreements about its definition. The inevitable coexistence of different approaches to the concept has hindered the development of a unique theoretical framework. However, the efforts to conceptualise participation and to understand the increasing participatory practices in/through media in the last years has nourished the field of participatory communication and participatory culture with insightful ideas that serve as common ground for future research. Most of these ideas, while apparently contradictory, follow similar patterns and interests that could potentially lead to a shared understanding of what participation is or should be. This article tries to contribute to the objective of rescuing participation by theoretically reviewing the conceptual apparatus of participation in Communication and Media Studies and introducing the idea that participation can be conceptualized through the metaphor of the talisman. Following Lakoff and Johnson (1980), this article argues that the way we conceptualize phenomena has an influence on how we perceive our practices. If we assume to rescue as an act to save from danger or evil, we should reclaim an understanding of participation as a powerful amulet. In that sense, the theoretical review of the conceptualizations of participation in the field of Media and Communication Studies that this article offers, will argue that participation can, at least partially, be structured, understood, defined and used in terms of a talisman. Specifically, the text will discuss four aspects that structure this metaphorical concept: participation as a fantasy, the authenticity of participation, the ritual of participation, and its (aesthetic) value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, D., Bailey, M., Carpentier, N., Fenton, N., Jenkins, H., Lothian, A., Qiu, J. L., Schäfer, M. T. & Srinivasan, R. (2014). Participations: dialogues on the participatory promise of contemporary culture and politics. Part 3: Politics. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1129-1151.

Andrejevic, M. (2004). Reality TV: the work of being watched. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

Arias Maldonado, M. (2016). La democracia sentimental. Política y emociones en el siglo XXI. Madrid: Página Indómita.

Barry, M. & Doherty, G. (2017). What we talk about when we talk about interactivity: empowerment in public discourse. New Media & Society, 19(7), 1052-1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815625944

Bergillos, I. (2017). Two sides of the same coin? A reflection on the relation between engagement and participation in media. Comunicación y Hombre, 14, 119-134.

Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman.

Carey, J. W. (1990). Technology as a totem for culture: and a defense of the oral tradition. American Journalism, 7(4), 242-251.

Carpentier, N. (2007). Participation and media. In B. Cammaerts & N. Carpentier (Eds.), Reclaiming the media: communication rights and democratic media roles (pp. 57-78). Bristol: Intellect.

Carpentier, N. (2011a). Media and participation. Bristol & Chicago: Intellect.

Carpentier, N. (2011b). The concept of participation – if they have access and interact, do they really participate? Communication Management Quarterly, 21, 13-36.

Carpentier, N. (2014). “Fuck the clowns from Grease!!” Fantasies of participation and agency in the YouTube comments on a Cypriot Problem documentary. Information, Communication & Society, 17(8), 1001-1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.875582

Carpentier, N. (2016). Beyond the ladder of participation: an analytical toolkit for the critical analysis of participatory media processes. Javnost – The Public, 23(1), 70-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2016.1149760

Carpentier, N., Dahlgren, P. & Pasquali, F. (2013). Waves of media democratization: a brief history of contemporary participatory practices in the media sphere. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19(3), 287-294.

Couldry, N. & Jenkins, H. (2014). Participations: dialogues on the participatory promise of contemporary culture and politics. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1107-1112.

Dahlgren, P. (2013). The political web. Media, participation and alternative democracy. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.

Delwiche, A. (2013). The new left and the computer underground. Recovering political antecedents of participatory culture. In A. Delwiche & J. Jacobs Henderson (Ed.), The participatory cultures handbook (pp. 10-21). Nova Iorque: Routledge.

Delwiche, A. & Jacobs Henderson, J. (2013). The participatory cultures handbook. Nova Iorque: Routledge.

Deuze, M. (2008). Corporate appropriation of participatory culture. In N. Carpentier & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Participation and media production: critical reflections on content creation (pp. 27-40). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishers.

Domingo, D. (2008). Interactivity in the daily routines of online newsrooms: dealing with an uncomfortable myth. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 680-704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00415.x

Enli, G. (2015). Mediated authenticity: how the media constructs reality. Nova Iorque e Londres: Peter Lang.

Fiske, J. (1987). Television culture: popular pleasures and politics. Londres: Routledge.

Foss, S. & Griffin, C. (1995). Beyond persuasion: a proposal for an invitational rhetoric. Communication Monographs, 62(1), 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376345

Garcia-Catalán, S. (2012). Hipertexto y modelización cinematográfica en la divulgación neurocientífica audiovisual. A propósito de ‘Redes’ de Eduard Punset. Tese de doutoramento, Universidade Jaume I, Castellón, Espanha.

Gaventa, J. (2007). Finding the spaces for change: a power analysis. IDS Bulletin, 37, 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00320.x

Greiner, K. & Singhal, A. (2009). Communication and invitational social change. Journal of Development Communication, 20(2), 31-44.

Gulbrandsen, I. T. & Just, S. N. (2011). The collaborative paradigm: towards an invitational and participatory concept of online communication. Media, Culture & Society, 33(7), 1095-1108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711416066

Hildburgh, W. L. (1951). Psychology underlying the employment of amulets in Europe. Folklore, 62(1), 231-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015587X.1951.9718026

Hille, S. & Bakker, P. (2013). I like news. Searching for the Holy Grail of social media: The use of Facebook by Dutch news media and their audiences. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 663-680.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. Nova Iorque: New York University Press.

Jenkins, H. & Carpentier, N. (2013). Theorizing participatory intensities: a conversation about participation and politics. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19(3), 265-286.

Jenkins, H., Ito, M. & boyd, d. (2016). Participatory culture in a networked era. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Jenkins, H. Shresthova, S. Gamber-Thomson, L. & Zimmerman, A. (2016). By any media necessary: the new youth activism. Nova Iorque: New York University Press.

Jensen, J. F. (2008). The concept of interactivity – revisited: four new typologies for a new media landscape. In J. Masthoff, S. Panabaker, M. Sullivan & A. Lugmayr (Eds.), Atas da 1ª Conferência Internacional “Designing Interactive User Experiences for TV and Video” (pp. 129-132). Mountain View: Association for Computing Machinery.

Johnson, D. (2007). Inviting audiences in. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 5(1), 61-80.

Klein Shagrir, O. (2018). Para-interactivity and the appeal of television in the digital age. Londres: Lexington Books.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago e Londres: University of Chicago Press.

Lecouteux, C. (2014). The high magic of talismans and amulets. Vermont: Inner Traditions.

Martín Ansón, M. L. (2005). Amuletos-talismanes para caballos, en forma de creciente, en la España medieval. Archivo Español de Arte, 309, 5-21.

McMillan, S. J. (2006). Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: users, documents and systems. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of new media (pp. 206-229). Londres: Sage.

McQuail, D. (2005). McQuail’s mass communication theory. Londres: Sage.

Mosco, V. (2017). Becoming digital. Toward a post-internet society. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.

Pärn, K. (2017). Metaphorical modelling as research method in semiotics. Punctum, 3(2), 33-60. https://doi.org/10.18680/hss.2018.0003

Pasquali, F., Noguera Vivo, J. M. & Bourdaa, M. (2013). Emerging topics in the research on digital audiences and participation. An agenda for increasing research efforts. Comunicazioni Sociali, 3, 329-336.

Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Peters, C. & Witschge, T. (2015). From grand narratives of democracy to small expectations of participation. Journalism Practice, 9(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.928455

Prado, E. (1986). Garantizar la participación y el pluralismo. In E. Bustamante & J. Villafañe (Eds.), La televisión en España mañana. Modelos televisivos y opciones ideológicas (pp. 179-185). Madrid: Siglo XXI.

Quiring, O. & Schweiger, W. (2008). Interactivity: a review of the concept and a framework for analysis. Communications, 33, 147-167. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2008.009

Quandt, T. (2018). Dark participation. Media and Communication, 6(4), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519

Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity. From new media to communication. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing Communication Science: merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 110-134). Newbury Park: Sage.

Reifová, I. & Svelch, J. (2013). Shrinking the grand narratives in theorizing participation and new media. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19(3), 261-264.

Ross, S. M. (2008). Beyond the box: television and the internet. Victoria: Blackwell.

Servaes, J. (1999). Communication for development. One world, multiple cultures. Cresskill: Hampton Press.

Velázquez Brieva, F. (2004). Análisis tipológico y contextual de los amuletos fenicio-púnicos en el mediterráneo centro-occidental. Tese de doutoramento, Universidade Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Espanha.

Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2018). Emotions, media and politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Published

2019-12-20

How to Cite

Bergillos, I. (2019). Participation as a talisman: a metaphorical-theoretical reflection about the conceptualization of participation. Comunicação E Sociedade, 36, 207–221. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.36(2019).2352

Issue

Section

Thematic Articles