Children, digital screens and family: parental mediation practices and gender

Carolina Duek; Marina Moguillansky

doi:10.17231/comsoc.37(2020).2407

Autores

Carolina Duek CONICET, Universidade de Buenos Aires, Argentina http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3103-0363
Marina Moguillansky CONICET, Universidade Nacional de San Martín, Argentina http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8873-1136

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.37(2020).2407

Palavras-chave:

mediação parental, Argentina, telas digitais, crianças

Resumo

Este artigo tem como objetivo explorar as características de gênero da parentalidade digital e da mediação parental através de um estudo qualitativo desenvolvido com famílias e crianças na Argentina. Recentemente, diversas tipologias foram elaboradas para entender melhor a mediação dos pais em relação às telas digitais. Estudos quantitativos correlacionaram diferentes estilos de mediação parental com variáveis sociodemográficas e também avaliaram a sua eficácia na prevenção de vários riscos online. Neste artigo, usamos dados qualitativos de um estudo que recorreu à técnica de tecnobiografias para construir uma abordagem aprofundada das práticas e representações das crianças com várias vozes envolvidas (pais, professores, autoridades da escola). Como mostramos, diferentes tipos de mediação parental estão associados a mães ou pais, seguindo ideologias e estereótipos de gênero mais amplos. Através de dados provenientes de famílias diferentes, construímos a hipótese de que existe uma divisão de gênero na parentalidade digital.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Austin, E.W. (1993). Exploring the effects of active parental mediation of television content. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 37, 147–158. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/08838159309364212

Banks, S. & Gupta, R. (1980). Television as a dependent variable, for a change. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 327–330. Retirado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/2489017?seq=1

Benítez Larghi, S. & Duek, C. (2019). Infancias y tecnologías en Argentina: interacciones y vínculos intergeneracionales. Revista Nómadas. Tramas contemporáneas en comunicación y educación, 1(49), 121-135. https://www.doi.org/10.30578/nomadas.n49a7

Blum-Ross, A. & Livingstone, S. (2018). The trouble with “screen time” rules. In G. Mascheroni; C. Ponte & A. Jorge (Eds.), Digital parenting. the challenges for families in the digital age (pp.179-188). Gothenburg: The International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media, at Nordicom University of Gothenburg. Retirado de https://www.nordicom.gu.se/sv/system/tdf/publikationer-hela-pdf/yearbook_2018_digital_parenting.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=39884&force=0

Ching, C. & Vigdor, L. (2005, maio). Technobiographies: perspectives from education and the arts. Comunicação apresentada no First International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, Illinois. Retirado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267794313_Technobiographies_Perspectives_from_Education_and_the_Arts

Clark, L. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication theory, 21(4), 323-343. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x

Duek. C. (2011). Infancias globales, infancias locales. La televisión y la representación de los más chicos. In A. Entel (Ed.), Infancias de Latinoamérica. Un cuadro de situación, Buenos Aires: Fundación Walter Benjamin, Fundación Arcor. Retirado de http://www.walterbenjamin.org.ar/down/LIBRO-%20INFANCIAS-2014.pdf

Duek, C. (2014) Juegos, juguetes y nuevas tecnologías. Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual.

Gil-Juárez, A., Vitores, A. & Feliu, J. (2015). Del género a la tecnología y de la tecnología al género: repertorios interpretativos de padres y madres sobre las chicas y los videojuegos. Communication papers, (6), 81-97.

Giudici, S. (2018). Informe de gestión ENACOM, Secretaría de Modernización, Presidencia de la Nación. Retirado de https://www.enacom.gob.ar/informes-de-gestion_p3218

INDEC, Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos de la República Argentina. (2017). Documentos. Censo nacional, Argentina.

Kirwill, L., Garmendia, M., Garitaonandia, C. & Martínez Fernández, G. (2009). Parental mediation. In S. Livingstone & L. Haddon (Eds.), Kids online: opportunities and risks for children (pp.199-215). Bristol: Policy Press.

Livingstone, S. & Byrne, J. (2018). Parenting in the digital age. The challenges of parental responsibility in comparative perspective. In G. Mascheroni; C. Ponte & A. Jorge (Eds.), Digital parenting. The challenges for families in the digital age, (pp. 19-30). Gothenburg: The International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media, at Nordicom University of Gothenburg. Retirado de https://www.nordicom.gu.se/sv/system/tdf/publikationer-hela-pdf/yearbook_2018_digital_parenting.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=39884&force=0

Livingstone, S. & Helsper, E. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of broadcasting and electronic media, 52(4), 581-599. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396

Livingstone, S., Kalmus, V. & Talves, K. (2014). Girls’ and boys’ experiences of online risk and safety. In C. Carter; L. Steiner & L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The Routledge companion to media and gender (pp. 190-200). Londres: Routledge.

Mascheroni, G., Ponte, C. & Jorge, A. (2018). Introduction.. In G. Mascheroni; C. Ponte & A. Jorge (Eds.), Digital Parenting. The challenges for families in the digital age (pp. 9-18). Gothenburg: The International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media, at Nordicom University of Gothenburg. Retirado de https://www.nordicom.gu.se/sv/system/tdf/publikationer-hela-pdf/yearbook_2018_digital_parenting.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=39884&force=0

Mesch, G. (2009). Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology & behavior: the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society, 12(4), 387-93. https://www.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0068

Morley, D. (1992). Television, audiences and cultural studies. Londres: Taylor & Francis.

Mostmans, L. (2016). Internet mediation and the family gap: explorative ethnographic interviews in new family forms in Belgium. Journal of Children and Media, 10(4), 481-496. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2016.1222298.

Nathanson, A. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children’s aggression. Communication research, 26(2), 124-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026002002

Nathanson, A. (2001). Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(2), 201-220. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4502_1

Nathanson, A. (2002). The unintended effects of parental mediation of television on adolescents. Mediapsychology, 4, 207-230. https://www.doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_01

Nikken, P. & Schols, M. (2015). How and why parents guide the media use of young children. Journal of child and family studies, 24, 3423-3435. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4.

Pasquier, D., Simões, J. A. & Kredens, E. (2012). Agents of mediation and sources of safety awareness: a comparative overview. In S. Livingstone, L. Haddon & A. Görzig (Eds), Children, risk and safety on the internet. Research and policy challenges in comparative perspective (pp. 219-230). Bristol: Polity Press.

Pereira, S. (1998). A televisão na família. Processos de mediação com crianças em idade pré-escolar. Braga: Instituto de estudos da criança. Retirado de http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/4265/1/TVnaFam%c3%adlia.pdf

Ponte, C. (2018). Challenging online situations reported by Italian and Portuguese children in 2018. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación/Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 10(1), 37-50. https://www.doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2019.10.2.3

Ponte, C., Simoes, J., Batista, S. & Castro, T. (2019). Implicados, intermitentes, desengajados? Estilos de mediação de pais de crianças de 3-8 anos que usam a internet. Sociologia, problemas e práticas, (91), 39-58). Retirado de http://journals.openedition.org/spp/6442

Rosen, L. D., Cheever, N. A. & Carrier, L. M. (2008). The association of parenting style and child age with parental limit setting and adolescent MySpace behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 459-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.005

SINCA, National System of Cultural Consumptions. (2017). Los jóvenes y los consumos culturales. Informe de investigación sobre los consumos culturales de los jóvenes en la Argentina, basado en los resultados de la Encuesta Nacional de Consumos Culturales, edición 2017. Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Cultura de la Nación. Retirado de https://www.cultura.gob.ar/media/uploads/jovenes_y_consumos_culturales_1.pdf

Talves, K. & Kalmus, V. (2015). Gendered mediation of children’s internet use: a keyhole for looking into changing socialization practices. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-4

Valcke, M., Bontea, S., de Wevera, B. & Rotsa, I. (2010). Internet parenting styles and the impact on internet use of primary school children, Computers & Education, 55(2), 454–464). Retirado de https://users.ugent.be/~mvalcke/CV/parenting.pdf

Valkenburg, P., Krcmar, M., Peters, A. & Marseille, N. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three different styles of television mediation: ‘Instructive mediation’, ‘restrictive mediation’, and ‘social coviewing’. Journal of broadcasting and electronic media, 43(2), 52-66.

Warren, R. (2005). Parental mediation of children’s television viewing in low income families. Journal of Communication, 55, 847–863. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03026.x