Perceptions of Communication Directors Regarding the Professional Conflicts Posed by Generative Artificial Intelligence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.50(2026).7169

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, corporate communication, communication directors’ perceptions, professional conflicts, ethics and automation

Abstract

The adoption of generative artificial intelligence tools in corporate communication is transforming professional practice and generating new ethical, strategic, and organizational conflicts. This article explores communication directors’ perceptions of these challenges, mediating between process automation, audience management, and organizational reputation. Between November 2024 and January 2025, 92 corporate communication professionals participated in the study, and 90 identified risks associated with implementing generative artificial intelligence. The main perceived risks, in order of frequency, include: dependence on technological tools, the spread of misinformation, the introduction of bias, difficulties in humanizing communication, loss of control over the narrative, uniformity in corporate communication, and degradation of creative thinking. The results allow for an analysis of how communication directors perceive and address these conflicts, contributing reflections on strategic leadership, professional ethics, and adaptation to technological innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Patricia Coll-Rubio, EAE Business School, Barcelona, Spain

    Patricia Coll-Rubio is a professor and researcher in strategic communication, corporate communication and digital media. Her research focuses on communication management, artificial intelligence, journalism and organizational communication. 

References

Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.

Argenti, P. A. (2014). Comunicación estratégica y su contribución a la reputación (M. de Ancos & I. Vicente, Trans.). Lid Editorial. (Original work published 2013)

Baudrillard, J. (1985). À sombra das maiorias silenciosas: O fim do social e o surgimento das massas (S. Bastos, Trans.). Brasiliense. (Original work published 1978)

Bick, A., Blandin, A., & Deming, D. J. (2024). The rapid adoption of generative AI (NBER Working Paper No. 32966). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w32966

Buckley, C., Norman, M., Troy, C., Yang, Y., Bao, J., Overton, H. K., & Jung, Y. (2025). AI disclosure in strategic CSR communication: Examining the impact of narratives, source labels, message transparency, and organizational perceptions on behavioral intentions. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 19(5), 696–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2025.2514276

Capriotti, P. (1999). Planificación estratégica de la imagen corporativa. Ariel.

Castells, M. (2001). La galaxia internet: Reflexiones sobre internet, empresa y sociedad. Plaza & Janés.

Cea D’Ancona, M. A. (1996). Metodología cuantitativa: Estrategias y técnicas de investigación social. Síntesis.

Codina, L., Aguilera-Cora, E., Lopezosa, C., & Freixa, P. (2025). Critical thinking and artificial intelligence in academia: A qualitative matrix analysis procedure for evaluating AI systems. In J. Guallar, M. Vállez, & A. Ventura-Cisquella (Eds.), Digital communication. Trends and good practices (pp. 161–173). Ediciones Profesionales de la Información. https://doi.org/10.3145/cuvicom.12.eng

Committee on Publication Ethics. (2023, February 13). Authorship and AI tools: COPE position statement. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/authorship-and-ai-tools

Cornelissen, J. (2020). Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice. SAGE.

Esposito, E. (2022). Artificial communication: How algorithms comfort, distract, and control us. The MIT Press.

European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:L_202401689

Global Alliance for Public Relations and Communication Management. (2024). Reimagining tomorrow: AI in PR and communication management. https://globalalliancepr.org/reimagining-tomorrow-ai-in-pr-and-communication-management/

Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Vol. 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press. (Original work published 1981)

Kelm, K., & Johann, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in corporate communications: Determinants of acceptance and transformative processes. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 30(1), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2024-0051

Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087

Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing management. Prentice Hall.

L’Etang, J. (2009). Relaciones públicas. Conceptos, práctica y crítica. Editorial UOC. (Original work published 2008)

Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 37–51). Harper & Brothers.

Lewis, S. C., Guzman, A. L., Schmidt, T. R., & Lin, B. (2025). Generative AI and its disruptive challenge to journalism: An institutional analysis. Communication and Change, 1, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44382-025-00008-x

López-Roldán, P., & Fachelli, S. (2015). Metodología de la investigación social cuantitativa. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. The MIT Press.

Marston, J. E. (1963). The nature of public relations. McGraw-Hill.

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.

Pilo-García, M. A., Romero-Gutiérrez, J. M., de-Casas-Moreno, P., & Aguaded, I. (2024). El impacto de la inteligencia artificial en comunicación. Revisión sistematizada de la producción científica española en Scopus (2020–2023). Razón y Palabra, 28(119), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.26807/rp.v28i119.2098

Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. P. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203931653

Túñez López, J. (2021). Tendencias e impacto de la inteligencia artificial en comunicación: Cobotización, gig economy, co-creación y gobernanza. Fonseca, Journal of Communication, (22), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.14201/fjc-v22-25766

Vállez, M., Alcaraz-Martínez, R., & Lopezosa, C. (2026). Search engine visibility of university AI content: An analysis of thirty institutions from three countries. Digital Library Perspectives, 42(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-03-2025-0035

van Riel, C. B. M. (1995). Principles of corporate communication. Prentice Hall.

Zamith, R. (2018). Algorithms and journalism. In M. Powers (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of communication (pp. 1–21). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.779

Zerfass, A., Moreno, Á., Tench, R., Verčič, D., & Verhoeven, P. (2025). European communication monitor 2025/2026: The era of AI-driven communication and intergenerational leadership. EUPRERA/EACD. https://www.communicationmonitor.eu/2025/11/17/ecm-european-communication-monitor-2025/

Published

2026-09-28

Issue

Section

Thematic Articles

How to Cite

Perceptions of Communication Directors Regarding the Professional Conflicts Posed by Generative Artificial Intelligence. (2026). Comunicação E Sociedade, 50, e026017. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.50(2026).7169

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.