Artificial Intelligence as a New Field of Human Interaction: A Critique of Knowledge Production

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.47(2025).6190

Keywords:

artificial inteligence, communication, knowledge, capitalism

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has gained a prominent role in human interaction and information production in various social spheres. At the same time, warnings are emerging from multiple institutions and experts regarding its proliferation, whether due to the possibility of automating certain jobs or tasks or the increasing difficulty in distinguishing between what is produced by a human being and what is produced by this new technology. However, in many of these discussions, a set of terms such as “communication”, “information”, “knowledge”, “consciousness” and “creativity”, among others, without due concern for defining these capabilities and situating them historically — hence the rapid descent into a perspective that is either apocalyptic or enthusiastic, without understanding the social processes involved and the possible consequences of the development and application of these technologies. Faced with this discursive landscape, which proliferates in all types of media, by focusing on the production of databases on which the various models of generative AI are based, we aim to situate the development of AI, and more specifically generative AI, historically in the context of the development of capitalism; to advance a critical perspective on human capabilities (namely, communicating, thinking and producing knowledge) and, finally, to try to anticipate the possible consequences of the introduction of these technologies not only in the production process but also in the sphere of consumption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • João Francisco Pinho, Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal

    João Francisco Pinho is a master’s student in Sociology at the University of Minho, Braga, Portugal. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Sociology from NOVA University Lisbon and a bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering from Instituto Superior Técnico. His current research interests include the production of artificial intelligence, the production of scientific knowledge, and the relationship between the climate crisis and the development of capitalism.

  • Fernando Bessa Ribeiro, Centro Interdisciplinar em Ciências Sociais, Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal

    Fernando Bessa Ribeiro is an associate professor at the Institute of Social Sciences, University of Minho, where he currently serves as director of the Department of Sociology. He holds a PhD in Social Sciences from the University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro and also teaches Sociology at NOVA University Lisbon. He is a researcher at the Interdisciplinary Centre for Social Sciences. His main areas of interest include capitalism, housing, and urban issues, on which he has published extensively in both national and international journals. He was recently awarded the António Dornelas Prize for his contribution to the study A Pobreza em Portugal: Trajetos e Quotidianos, conducted in collaboration with a team of researchers and funded by the Francisco Manuel dos Santos Foundation.

References

AI Now Institute. (2023, 11 de abril). ChatGPT and more: Large scale AI models entrench big tech power. https://ainowinstitute.org/publications/large-scale-ai-models

Altenried, M. (2022). The digital factory. The human labor of automation. The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226815503.001.0001

Arboleda, M. (2020). Planetary mine: Territories of extraction under late capitalism. Verso Books.

Arreigoso, V. L. (2024, 21 de novembro). Empresa oferece ao Governo solução de inteligência artificial para retirar técnicos do atendimento de emergência. Expresso. https://expresso.pt/sociedade/2024-11-21-empresa-oferece-ao-governo-solucao-de-inteligencia-artificial-para-retirar-tecnicos-do-atendimento-de-emergencia-126fbfe9

Azeri, S. (2024). On the nature of thought: Centennial of Evald Ilyenkov. Marxism & Sciences, 3(1), iii–xxiv. https://doi.org/10.56063/MS.2403.03100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56063/MS.2403.03100

Bakhurst, D. (1991). Consciousness and revolution in Soviet philosophy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511608940 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511608940

Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Polity.

Best, B. (2024). The automatic fetish: The law of value in Marx’s Capital. Verso.

Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1–7), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X

Bunyard, T. (2018). Debord, time and spectacle. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004356023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004356023

Cant, C., Muldoon, J., & Graham, M. (2024). Feeding the machine. The hidden human labor powering A.I. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Comité Invisível. (2024). A insurreição que vem, aos nossos amigos, agora (Edições Antipáticas, Trad.). Tigre de Papel. (Trabalho original publicado em 2014)

Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300252392

Crawford, K., & Paglen, T. (2019). Excavating AI: The politics of images in machine learning training sets. AI & Society, 36, 1105–1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01162-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01162-8

Damásio, A. (1994). O erro de Descartes. Publicações Europa-América.

Daston, L. (2017). The immortal archive: Nineteenth-century science imagines the future. In L. Daston (Ed.), Science in the archives: Pasts, presents, futures (pp. 159–182). The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226432533.003.0006

Dupuy, J.-P. (2009). On the origins of cognitive science. The mechanization of the mind (M. B. DeBevoise, Trad.). The MIT Press. (Trabalho original publicado em 1994)

Escritores, tradutores e editores exigem medidas sobre uso da inteligência artificial pelas editoras. (2024, 5 de abril). Jornal de Notícias. https://www.jn.pt/4434486895/escritores-tradutores-e-editores-exigem-medidas-sobre-uso-da-inteligencia-artificial-pelas-editoras/

Foucault, M. (2009). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78. Palgrave Macmillan. (Trabalho original publicado em 1978)

Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital albour and Karl Marx. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880075

Galison, P. (1992). The many faces of big science. In P. Galison & B. W. Hevly (Eds.), Big science: The growth of large-scale research (pp. 1–17). Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2809880

Gerovitch, S. (2002). From newspeak to cyberspeak: A history of soviet cybernetics. The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3137.001.0001

Gershgorn, D. (2017, 26 de julho). The data that transformed AI research—And possibly the world. Quartz. https://qz.com/1034972/the-data-that-changed-the-direction-of-ai-research-and-possibly-the-world

Gould, S. J. (1988). O mundo depois de Darwin (P. Vitória, Trad.). Presença. (Trabalho original publicado em 1977)

Gray, M. L., & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Harper Business.

Habermas, J. (2012). Teoria do agir comunicativo: Racionalidade da ação e racionalização social (P. A. Soethe, Trad.). Martins Fontes. (Trabalho original publicado em 1981)

Harvey, D. (2018). The limits to capital. Verso.

Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we become posthuman. Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics. The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001

Heller, A. (2018). The theory of need in Marx. Verso.

Ilyenkov, E. (2007). Our schools must teach how to think! Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 45(4), 9–49. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405450402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405450402

Ilyenkov, E. (2014). Dialectics of the ideal. In A. Levant & V. Oittinen (Eds.), Dialectics of the ideal (pp. 25–78). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004246928_003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004246928_003

Ilyenkov, E., Arsen’ev, A., & Davydov, V. (2024). Machine and human, cybernetics and philosophy (I. Maksymets, Trad.). Marxism & Sciences, 3(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.56063/MS.2408.03209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56063/MS.2408.03209

Kang, M. (2011). Sublime dreams of living machines: The automaton in the European imagination. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674059412

Last, J. (2024, 17 de janeiro). What feral children can teach us about AI. NOEMA. https://www.noemamag.com/feral-intelligence/

Lemonie, B. (2022, 11 de junho). Is LaMDA Sentient? — An Interview. Medium. https://cajundiscordian.medium.com/is-lamda-sentient-an-interview-ea64d916d917

Li, P., Yang, J., Islam, M. A., & Ren, S. (2023). Making AI less “thirsty”: Uncovering and addressing the secret water footprint of AI models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.03271

Martins, H. (2011). Experimentum humanum – Civilização tecnológica e condição Humana. Relógio D’Água.

Marx, K. (1994). Manuscritos económico-filosóficos de 1844 (M. A. Pacheco, Trad.). Edições Avante. (Trabalho original publicado em 1932)

Marx, K. (2010). Speech at anniversary of The People’s Paper. In Marx & Engels: Selected works (Vol. 14; pp. 655–656). Lawrence & Wishart. (Trabalho original publicado em 1856)

Marx, K. (2024). Capital: Critique of political economy (Vol. 1; P. Reitter, Trad.). Princeton University Press. (Trabalho original publicado em 1867) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.12900786

Mitchell, M. (2019). Artificial intelligence: A guide for thinking humans. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Morozov, E. (2024, agosto). Uma outra inteligência artificial é possível. Le Monde Diplomatique, 214, 34–37. https://pt.mondediplo.com/2024/08/uma-outra-inteligencia-artificial-e-possivel.html

Moscovici, S. (1977). A sociedade contranatura (F. Sequeira & J. D. Gil Nave, Trads.). Bertrand.

Narayanan, A., & Kapoor, S. (2024). AI snake oil: What artificial intelligence can do, what it can’t, and how to tell the difference. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691249643

Nilsson, N. J. (2010). The quest for artificial intelligence: A history of ideas and achievements. Cambridge University Press.

Pasquinelli, M. (2019). How a machine learns and fails: A grammar of error for artificial intelligence. Spheres, 5, 1–17.

Pitron, G. (2021, 1 de outubro). Quando a tecnologia digital destrói o planeta. Le Monde Diplomatique, 171, 20–22. https://diplomatique.org.br/quando-a-tecnologia-digital-destroi-o-planeta/

Ribeiro, F. B. (2022). Sem corpo (ou o futuro pós-humano). Supernova, (1), 26–29.

Schaffer, S. (1994). Babbage’s intelligence: Calculating engines and the factory system. Critical Inquiry, 21(1), 203–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448746

minutes. (2024, 26 de maio). Future technology [Vídeo]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrJsExM8D-o&t=1824s

Starosielski, N. (2015). The undersea network. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822376224

Stone, P., Brooks, R., & Calo, R. (2016). Artificial intelligence and life in 2030. https://ai100.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj18871/files/media/file/ai100report10032016fnl_singles.pdf

Taub, L. (2017). Archiving scientific ideas in Greco- Roman antiquity. In L. Daston (Ed.), Science in the archives: Pasts, presents, futures (pp. 113–136). The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226432533.003.0004

Vale, F. (2023, 19 de junho). Traduções por inteligência artificial (IA) chegam a Portugal sem se fazer anunciar. Comunidade Cultura e Arte. https://comunidadeculturaearte.com/traducoes-por-inteligencia-artificial-ia-chegam-a-portugal-sem-se-fazer-anunciar/

Zuboff, S. (2020). A era do capitalismo da vigilância (L. F. Silva & M. S. Pereira, Trads.). Relógio D’Água. (Trabalho original publicado em 2018)

Published

2025-06-23

How to Cite

Pinho, J. F., & Bessa Ribeiro, F. (2025). Artificial Intelligence as a New Field of Human Interaction: A Critique of Knowledge Production. Comunicação E Sociedade, 47, e025008. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.47(2025).6190

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.